Easyton® transpalpebral versus Perkins applanation tonometry in different populations

Objective  To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using the new transpalpebral Easyton® tonometer and Perkins applanation tonometer (PAT) in three different clinical populations. Methods The participants of this prospective study were 84 subjects divided into the groups: 22 heal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International ophthalmology 2023-10, Vol.43 (10), p.3491-3497
Hauptverfasser: Montolío-Marzo, Elena, Morales-Fernández, Laura, Saenz-Frances San Baldomero, Federico, García-Saenz, Sofía, García-Feijoo, Julián, Piñero, David P., Martínez-de-la-Casa, Jose M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective  To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using the new transpalpebral Easyton® tonometer and Perkins applanation tonometer (PAT) in three different clinical populations. Methods The participants of this prospective study were 84 subjects divided into the groups: 22 healthy children (G1), 42 healthy adults (G2), and 20 adult patients with primary open angle glaucoma (G3). The data recorded in 84 eyes of these subjects were age, sex, gender, central corneal thickness (CCT), and axial length (AL). In all eyes, IOP was determined in the same examination room by the same experienced examiner using Easyton® and PAT in random order. Results  Mean differences in IOP readings between Easyton® and PAT were 0.45 ± 1.97 ( p  = 0.295), − 0.15 ± 2.13 ( p  = 0.654), − 1.65 ± 3.22 ( p  = 0.033), and − 0.018 ± 2.50 mmHg ( p  = 0.500) in the groups G1, G2, G3, and whole sample (G4), respectively. Correlations between Easyton® and PAT IOP values were 0.668 ( p  = 0.001) for G1, 0.463 ( p  = 0.002) for G2, 0.680 ( p  
ISSN:1573-2630
0165-5701
1573-2630
DOI:10.1007/s10792-023-02754-7