Long‐term effect of eplerenone treatment in children with chronic allograft nephropathy

Background Literature supports the protective role of mineralocorticoid antagonist (MRA) against the renal injury induced by aldosterone in kidney transplant recipients. However, there is limited data available regarding the safety and efficacy of MRAs in pediatric renal transplant patients. Therefo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric transplantation 2023-09, Vol.27 (6), p.e14557-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Baskin, Esra, Siddiqui, Meraj Alam, Gülleroğlu, Kaan, Özdemir, Binnaz Handan, Yılmaz, Aysun Çaltık, Çolak, Meriç Yavuz, Akdur, Aydıncan, Soy, Ebru Ayvazoğlu, Moray, Gökhan, Haberal, Mehmet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Literature supports the protective role of mineralocorticoid antagonist (MRA) against the renal injury induced by aldosterone in kidney transplant recipients. However, there is limited data available regarding the safety and efficacy of MRAs in pediatric renal transplant patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of long‐term eplerenone administration in children with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Methods Twenty‐six renal transplant children with biopsy‐proven CAN, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR ) > 40 mL/min per 1.73 m2 and with a significant proteinuria were included. Selected patients were randomly divided into two groups as follows; Group 1 (n = 10) patients received 25 mg/day eplerenone and Group 2 (n = 16) patients did not receive eplerenone for 36 months. Patients were examined in the renal transplant outpatient clinic biweekly for the first month and once a month thereafter. The primary outcome of the patients was compared. Results Mean eGFR stayed stable in group 1 patients, but significantly decreased in group 2 at 36 months (57.53 ± 7.53 vs. 44.94 ± 8.04 mL/min per 1.73 m2, p = .001). Similarly, spot protein–creatinine ratio was significantly lower in group 1 compared to group 2 patients at 36 months (1.02 ± 7.53 vs. 3.61 ± 0.53, p 
ISSN:1397-3142
1399-3046
DOI:10.1111/petr.14557