Brachytherapy in the prevention of recurrence of conjunctival melanoma: Results of a case report in a University Hospital in Valladolid, Spain
Aim Describe the results of brachytherapy in the prevention of recurrences in conjunctival melanoma (CM) and describe a dosimetric protocol. Methods Retrospective and descriptive case report. Eleven consecutive patients with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of CM treated with brachytherapy be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2023-11, Vol.199 (11), p.1025-1030 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim
Describe the results of brachytherapy in the prevention of recurrences in conjunctival melanoma (CM) and describe a dosimetric protocol.
Methods
Retrospective and descriptive case report. Eleven consecutive patients with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of CM treated with brachytherapy between 1992 and 2023 were reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and dosimetric characteristics as well as recurrences were recorded. Quantitative variables were represented by the mean, median, and standard deviation, and qualitative variables by frequency of distribution.
Results
Of a total of 27 patients diagnosed with CM, 11 who were treated with brachytherapy were included in the study (7 female; mean age at time of treatment: 59.4 years). Mean follow-up was 58.82 months (range 11–141 months). Of a total of 11 patients, 8 were treated with ruthenium-106 and 3 with iodine-125. Brachytherapy was performed in 6 patients as adjuvant therapy after biopsy-proven CM on histopathology and in the other 5 patients after recurrence. The mean dose was 85 Gy in all cases. Recurrences outside of the previously irradiated area were observed in 3 patients, metastases were diagnosed in 2 patients, and one case of an ocular adverse event was reported.
Conclusion
Brachytherapy is an adjuvant treatment option in invasive conjunctival melanoma. In our case report, only one patient had an adverse effect. However, this topic requires further research. Furthermore, each case is unique and should be evaluated by experts in a multidisciplinary approach involving ophthalmologists, radiation oncologists, and physicists. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0179-7158 1439-099X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00066-023-02094-6 |