Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Potential Material for the Repair of Maxillofacial Defect Compared with E‑poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (e-PTFE) and Silicone

Silicone and e-poly­(tetrafluoroethylene) (e-PTFE) are the most commonly used artificial materials for repairing maxillofacial bone defects caused by facial trauma and tumors. However, their use is limited by poor histocompatibility, unsatisfactory support, and high infection rates. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has excellent mechanical strength and biocompatibility, but its application to the repair of maxillofacial bone defects lacks a theoretical basis. The microstructure and mechanical properties of e-PTFE, silicone, and PEEK were evaluated by electron microscopy, BOSE machine, and Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy. Mouse fibroblast L929 cells were incubated on the surface of the three materials to assess cytotoxicity and adhesion. The three materials were implanted onto the left femoral surface of 90 male mice, and samples of the implants and surrounding soft tissues were evaluated histologically at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-surgery. PEEK had a much higher Young’s modulus than either e-PTFE or silicone (p < 0.05 each), and maintained high stiffness without degradation long after implantation. Both PEEK and e-PTFE facilitated L929 cell adhesion, with PEEK having lower cytotoxicity than e-PTFE and silicone (p < 0.05 each). All three materials similarly hindered the motor function of mice 12 weeks after implantation (p > 0.05 each). Connective tissue ingrowth was observed in PEEK and e-PTFE, whereas a fibrotic peri-prosthetic capsule was observed on the surface of silicone. The postoperative infection rate was significantly lower for both PEEK and silicone than for e-PTFE (p < 0.05 each). PEEK shows excellent biocompatibility and mechanical stability, suggesting that it can be effective as a novel implant to repair maxillofacial bone defects.