A comparison of tunnel geometry between the Formosan subterranean termite and the Asian subterranean termite (Blattodea: Rhinotermitidae)

BACKGROUND Stake surveys and in‐ground monitoring stations have been widely used to study field populations of many subterranean termite species, but thus far they have never been intercepted by the invasive Asian subterranean termite, Coptotermes gestroi (Wasmann), in southeastern Florida. To investigate the reasons for the inability of C. gestroi to intercept these in‐ground monitoring devices, we compared its tunnel geometry with that of the Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki. Two‐year‐old incipient colonies of both species confined in simulated structural infestations were connected to planar arenas containing four wooden discs. RESULTS Coptotermes formosanus colonies constructed more abundant and more complex tunnel networks and intercepted more wooden discs than C. gestroi. C. formosanus propagated shorter primary tunnels and longer secondary tunnels with more branching frequency than C. gestroi, and probably adopted an area searching strategy to search for food in an area before moving on to other areas. In comparison, C. gestroi used a distance searching strategy by constructing linear and long primary tunnels to search for food at distance. CONCLUSIONS Because tunnels of C. gestroi were less abundant and they tend to travel straight for some distance, they may have bypassed survey stakes or in‐ground monitoring stations that are sparsely distributed in soil. The tunnel geometry of C. gestroi may explain why none of these in‐ground monitoring devices has been intercepted by this species in southeastern Florida. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry. C. gestroi display a distance searching strategy by excavating longer and fewer tunnels (A), whereas C. formosanus show an area searching strategy by constructing shorter and more abundant tunnels to search for food (B).