A 3-dimensional evaluation of available retromolar space for the application of ramal plates

This study aimed to evaluate the available retromolar space for ramal plates in patients with Class I and III malocclusions and compare that space with and without third molars using cone-beam computed tomography. Cone-beam computed tomography images of 30 patients (17 males, 13 females; mean age, 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2023-11, Vol.164 (5), p.628-635
Hauptverfasser: Seol, Jungeun, Bayome, Mohamed, Kook, Yoon-Ah, Kang, Seok Jae, Oh, Jiyoung, Ham, Lyun Kwang, Park, Jae Hyun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to evaluate the available retromolar space for ramal plates in patients with Class I and III malocclusions and compare that space with and without third molars using cone-beam computed tomography. Cone-beam computed tomography images of 30 patients (17 males, 13 females; mean age, 22.2 ± 4.5 years) with Class III malocclusion and 29 subjects (18 males, 11 females; mean age, 24.3 ± 3.7 years) with Class I malocclusion were analyzed. Available retromolar space at 4 axial levels of the second molar root and the volume of the retromolar bone were evaluated. Two-way repeated measures analysis of covariance (repeated measures analysis of covariance) was applied to compare the variables between Class I and III malocclusions and the presence of third molars. Patients with Class I and III relationships showed up to 12.7 mm of available retromolar space at 2 mm apical from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). At 8 mm apical from CEJ, patients with Class III malocclusion had 11.1 mm of space, whereas those with a Class I relationship showed 9.8 mm of available space. When patients had third molars, the amount of available retromolar space was significantly greater in patients with a Class I and III relationship. However, patients with Class III malocclusion exhibited greater available retromolar space than those with a Class I relationship (P = 0.028). In addition, the bone volume was significantly greater in patients with Class III malocclusion than in patients with a Class I relationship and those with third molars than in those without them (P 
ISSN:0889-5406
1097-6752
DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.03.020