Insights into the clinical development of regenerative medical products through a comparison of three cell-based products recently approved for limbal stem cell deficiency

Three regenerative medical products for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD), a rare and intractable ocular surface disease, have recently been approved in Japan. To our knowledge, this is the first time multiple stem-cell-based medical products have been approved for the same ocular disease. Developm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The ocular surface 2023-07, Vol.29, p.220-225
Hauptverfasser: Aketa, Naohiko, Kasai, Masaki, Noda, Shinichi, Asano, Junichi, Kunieda, Akiyoshi, Kawanishi, Shohei, Maruyama, Yoshiaki, Honda, Futaba
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Three regenerative medical products for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD), a rare and intractable ocular surface disease, have recently been approved in Japan. To our knowledge, this is the first time multiple stem-cell-based medical products have been approved for the same ocular disease. Development plans and study designs for each product differ, resulting in differences in indications. Since cell-based products have a heterogeneous formulation and often target rare diseases, they require a flexible approach to development. This review article describes the status and prospects of the clinical development of regenerative medical products by summarizing the issues of the three products from the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) standpoint. Implementing stem cell-based products is challenging, requiring scientific and flexible review by regulatory authorities. To overcome these issues in the development process, developers and regulatory authorities need to communicate and fully discuss study protocols from the early stage of development. •Three regenerative products for limbal stem cell deficiency been approved in Japan.•Development plans and study designs for each product was different from each other.•The differences resulted in differences in indications.
ISSN:1542-0124
1937-5913
DOI:10.1016/j.jtos.2023.05.008