Clinical utility of artificial intelligence assistance in histopathologic review of lymph node metastasis for gastric adenocarcinoma

Background Advances in whole-slide image capture and computer image analyses using deep learning technologies have enabled the development of computer-assisted diagnostics in pathology. Herein, we built a deep learning algorithm to detect lymph node (LN) metastasis on whole-slide images of LNs retri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of clinical oncology 2023-08, Vol.28 (8), p.1033-1042
Hauptverfasser: Matsushima, Jun, Sato, Tamotsu, Yoshimura, Yuichiro, Mizutani, Hiroyuki, Koto, Shinichiro, Matsusaka, Keisuke, Ikeda, Jun-ichiro, Sato, Taiki, Fujii, Akiko, Ono, Yuko, Mitsui, Takashi, Ban, Shinichi, Matsubara, Hisahiro, Hayashi, Hideki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Advances in whole-slide image capture and computer image analyses using deep learning technologies have enabled the development of computer-assisted diagnostics in pathology. Herein, we built a deep learning algorithm to detect lymph node (LN) metastasis on whole-slide images of LNs retrieved from patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and evaluated its performance in clinical settings. Methods We randomly selected 18 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery with curative intent and were positive for LN metastasis at Chiba University Hospital. A ResNet-152-based assistance system was established to detect LN metastases and to outline regions that are highly probable for metastasis in LN images. Reference standards comprising 70 LN images from two different institutions were reviewed by six pathologists with or without algorithm assistance, and their diagnostic performances were compared between the two settings. Results No statistically significant differences were observed between these two settings regarding sensitivity, review time, or confidence levels in classifying macrometastases, isolated tumor cells, and metastasis-negative. Meanwhile, the sensitivity for detecting micrometastases significantly improved with algorithm assistance, although the review time was significantly longer than that without assistance. Analysis of the algorithm’s sensitivity in detecting metastasis in the reference standard indicated an area under the curve of 0.869, whereas that for the detection of micrometastases was 0.785. Conclusions A wide variety of histological types in gastric adenocarcinoma could account for these relatively low performances; however, this level of algorithm performance could suffice to help pathologists improve diagnostic accuracy.
ISSN:1341-9625
1437-7772
DOI:10.1007/s10147-023-02356-4