Early detection of Spanish-speaking children with developmental language disorders: Concurrent validity of a short questionnaire and a screening test

•There is an under-identification of developmental language disorder in latin America.•We tested the efficiency of combining a parental questionnaire and a language screener.•Parental and clinician information combined improve the identification accuracy.•Combing a parental report measure with a lan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of communication disorders 2023-07, Vol.104, p.106339-106339, Article 106339
Hauptverfasser: Auza B, Alejandra, Murata, Chiharu, Peñaloza, Christian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•There is an under-identification of developmental language disorder in latin America.•We tested the efficiency of combining a parental questionnaire and a language screener.•Parental and clinician information combined improve the identification accuracy.•Combing a parental report measure with a language screener provides a useful, low cost, and accessible tool to identify children with DLD. . Under-identification of Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is a significant problem in monolingual Latin American Spanish-speaking children. We evaluated the identification utility of the sequential use of two screening tools, the "Parental Questionnaire (PQ)" and the "Screening for Language Problems (TPL)", to identify children who require confirmatory diagnosis of DLD. : Parents of children (4 to 6 years) were contacted in schools and public health centers in Mexico. Monolingual Spanish-speaking children with no auditory and cognitive disorders were eligible. The reference diagnosis of DLD was established using BESA (Bilingual English-Spanish Assessment) or SCELF-4 (Spanish Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals), combined with data from the narrative samples that yielded the percentage of ungrammaticality and the clinical judgment of two Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs). Responses to the PQ were obtained as a parental report, and the TPL was applied by a trained SLPs. . Both PQ and TPL presented a significant difference between the groups of children with DLD and typical language development (TLD). By combining the two instruments, a notable improvement in diagnostic utility was shown. . The combination of these two procedures provides an efficient method for screening children having the risk of DLD and contributes to resolving the problem of under-identification.
ISSN:0021-9924
1873-7994
DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106339