MRI and Trouillas’ grading system of pituitary tumors: the usefulness of T2 signal intensity volumetric values

Purpose To classify pituitary macroadenomas according to the Trouillas’ grading system; to compare this grading system with T2 values of volumetric signal intensity to determine T2 values able to predict the final grade. Methods A total of 106 patients with macroadenomas were grouped according to th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroradiology 2023-11, Vol.65 (11), p.1567-1578
Hauptverfasser: Calandrelli, Rosalinda, Pilato, Fabio, D’Apolito, Gabriella, Schiavetto, Stefano, Gessi, Marco, D’Alessandris, Quintino Giorgio, Lauretti, Liverana, Gaudino, Simona
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To classify pituitary macroadenomas according to the Trouillas’ grading system; to compare this grading system with T2 values of volumetric signal intensity to determine T2 values able to predict the final grade. Methods A total of 106 patients with macroadenomas were grouped according to the grading system score combining proliferation and invasiveness criteria of Trouillas’ classification. Normalized volumetric signal intensity values were extracted from coronal T2-weighted images (nT2mean, nT2Max, nT2min) and were compared with the final grading score system. Results Thirty-three patients were in grade 1a (non-invasive, non-proliferative tumors), 17 patients in grade 1b (non-invasive, proliferative tumors), 36 patients in grade 2a (invasive, non-proliferative tumors), and 20 patients in grade 2b (invasive, proliferative tumors). No patient was in grade 3 (metastatic tumors). nT2Max and nT2min were the best quantitative values to discriminate invasive from non-invasive grades; in invasive grades, nT2Max intensity values were higher, and nT2min intensity values were lower than in non-invasive grades. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of nT2 values showed that nT2min values had a better diagnostic performance than nT2Max values because they allowed differentiating with a moderate accuracy invasive tumors (2a or 2b grades) from both non-invasive proliferative tumors (1b) and non-invasive-non proliferative tumors (1a) (2a vs 1b: AUC nT2min = 0.78, 2b vs 1b: AUC nT2min = 0.72, 2a vs 1a: AUC nT2min = 0.72, 2b vs 1a AUC nT2min = 0.69). Conclusion Volumetric nT2Max and nT2min values of MRI might be practical and non-invasive markers for assessing tumor invasiveness although nT2 min signal intensity values have more effects in discriminating tumor’s invasive behavior.
ISSN:0028-3940
1432-1920
DOI:10.1007/s00234-023-03162-5