Differences between children and adults in the neural encoding of voice fundamental frequency in the presence of noise and reverberation

Environmental noise and reverberation challenge speech understanding more significantly in children than in adults. However, the neural/sensory basis for the difference is poorly understood. We evaluated the impact of noise and reverberation on the neural processing of the fundamental frequency of v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The European journal of neuroscience 2023-07, Vol.58 (2), p.2547-2562
Hauptverfasser: Easwar, Vijayalakshmi, Peng, Z. Ellen, Mak, Veronika, Mikiel‐Hunter, Jason
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Environmental noise and reverberation challenge speech understanding more significantly in children than in adults. However, the neural/sensory basis for the difference is poorly understood. We evaluated the impact of noise and reverberation on the neural processing of the fundamental frequency of voice (f0)—an important cue to tag or recognize a speaker. In a group of 39 6‐ to 15‐year‐old children and 26 adults with normal hearing, envelope following responses (EFRs) were elicited by a male‐spoken /i/ in quiet, noise, reverberation, and both noise and reverberation. Due to increased resolvability of harmonics at lower than higher vowel formants that may affect susceptibility to noise and/or reverberation, the /i/ was modified to elicit two EFRs: one initiated by the low frequency first formant (F1) and the other initiated by mid to high frequency second and higher formants (F2+) with predominantly resolved and unresolved harmonics, respectively. F1 EFRs were more susceptible to noise whereas F2+ EFRs were more susceptible to reverberation. Reverberation resulted in greater attenuation of F1 EFRs in adults than children, and greater attenuation of F2+ EFRs in older than younger children. Reduced modulation depth caused by reverberation and noise explained changes in F2+ EFRs but was not the primary determinant for F1 EFRs. Experimental data paralleled modelled EFRs, especially for F1. Together, data suggest that noise or reverberation influences the robustness of f0 encoding depending on the resolvability of vowel harmonics and that maturation of processing temporal/envelope information of voice is delayed in reverberation, particularly for low frequency stimuli. Encoding of voice fundamental frequency (f0) carried by low frequency vowel formants is more susceptible to noise whereas f0 encoding at mid‐to‐high frequency second and higher formants is more susceptible to reverberation. Adults experience more reverberation‐induced deterioration in f0 encoding than children at low frequencies.
ISSN:0953-816X
1460-9568
DOI:10.1111/ejn.16049