Risk of malignancy in T1-hyperintense Bosniak version 2019 class II and IIF cystic renal masses

Background Bosniak classification version 2019 includes cystic masses in class II and IIF based partly on their hyperintense appearance at T1-weighted MRI. The prevalence of malignancy in non-enhancing heterogeneously T1-hyperintense masses is unknown, nor whether the pattern of T1 hyperintensity af...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Abdominal imaging 2023-08, Vol.48 (8), p.2636-2648
Hauptverfasser: Shen, Luyao, Tse, Justin R., Lemieux, Simon, Yoon, Luke, Mullane, Patrick C., Liang, Tie, Davenport, Matthew S., Pedrosa, Ivan, Silverman, Stuart G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Bosniak classification version 2019 includes cystic masses in class II and IIF based partly on their hyperintense appearance at T1-weighted MRI. The prevalence of malignancy in non-enhancing heterogeneously T1-hyperintense masses is unknown, nor whether the pattern of T1 hyperintensity affects malignancy likelihood. Purpose To determine the malignancy proportion among six patterns of T1 hyperintensity within non-enhancing cystic renal masses. Methods This retrospective, single-institution study included 72 Bosniak class II and IIF, non-enhancing, T1-hyperintense cystic renal masses. Diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology or by follow-up imaging demonstrating 5-year size and morphologic stability, decreased in size by ≥ 30%, resolution, or Bosniak down-classification. Six patterns of T1 hyperintensity were pre-defined: homogeneous (pattern A), fluid–fluid level (pattern B), peripherally markedly T1-hyperintense (pattern C), containing a T1-hyperintense non-enhancing nodule (pattern D), peripherally T1-hypointense (pattern E), and heterogeneously T1-hyperintense without a distinct pattern (pattern F). Three readers independently assigned each mass to a pattern. Individual and mean malignancy proportion were determined. Mann–Whitney test and Fischer’s exact test compared the likelihood of malignancy between patterns. Inter-reader agreement was analyzed with Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC). Results Among 72 masses, the mean number of masses assigned was 11 (15%) to pattern A, 21 (29%) to pattern B, 6 (8%) to pattern C, 7 (10%) to pattern D, 5 (7%) to pattern E, and 22 (31%) to pattern F. Five of 72 masses (7%) were malignant; none was assigned pattern A, B, or D. Mean malignancy proportion was 5% (0/9, 1/6, and 0/4) for pattern C, 13% (0/4, 1/3, and 1/7) for pattern E, and 18% (5/20, 3/21, and 4/25) for pattern F. Malignant masses were more likely assigned to pattern E or F ( p  = 0.003–0.039). Inter-reader agreement was substantial (Gwet’s AC: 0.68). Conclusion Bosniak version 2019 class IIF masses that are non-enhancing and heterogeneously T1-hyperintense with a fluid–fluid level are likely benign. Those that are non-enhancing and heterogeneously T1-hyperintense without a distinct pattern have a malignancy proportion up to 25% (5/20). Graphical abstract
ISSN:2366-0058
2366-004X
2366-0058
DOI:10.1007/s00261-023-03955-5