Liraglutide versus semaglutide for weight reduction—a cost needed to treat analysis
Objective Higher doses of the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 agonists liraglutide and, more recently, semaglutide have demonstrated a significant reduction in body weight. However, their comparative value for money for this indication is unclear. Methods The cost needed to treat to achieve a 1% reduction i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) Md.), 2023-06, Vol.31 (6), p.1510-1513 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
Higher doses of the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 agonists liraglutide and, more recently, semaglutide have demonstrated a significant reduction in body weight. However, their comparative value for money for this indication is unclear.
Methods
The cost needed to treat to achieve a 1% reduction in body weight using semaglutide or liraglutide was calculated. The body weight reductions were extracted from the published STEP 1 trial and the SCALE trial results, respectively. A scenario analysis was performed to mitigate the primary differences between the two studies' populations. Drug costs were based on US GoodRx prices as of October 2022.
Results
Liraglutide in STEP 1 resulted in a weight loss of 5.4% (95% CI: 5%‐5.8%). Semaglutide in SCALE resulted in a weight loss of 12.4% (95% CI: 11.5%‐13.4%). The total cost of therapy with liraglutide during the trial was estimated at $17,585 compared with $22,878 with semaglutide. Accordingly, the cost needed to treat per 1% of body weight reduction with liraglutide is estimated at $3256 (95% CI: $3032‐$3517) compared with $1845 (95% CI: $1707‐$1989) with semaglutide.
Conclusions
Semaglutide provides significantly better value for money than liraglutide for weight reduction. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1930-7381 1930-739X |
DOI: | 10.1002/oby.23752 |