Liraglutide versus semaglutide for weight reduction—a cost needed to treat analysis

Objective Higher doses of the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 agonists liraglutide and, more recently, semaglutide have demonstrated a significant reduction in body weight. However, their comparative value for money for this indication is unclear. Methods The cost needed to treat to achieve a 1% reduction i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) Md.), 2023-06, Vol.31 (6), p.1510-1513
Hauptverfasser: Azuri, Joseph, Hammerman, Ariel, Aboalhasan, Enis, Sluckis, Ben, Arbel, Ronen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective Higher doses of the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 agonists liraglutide and, more recently, semaglutide have demonstrated a significant reduction in body weight. However, their comparative value for money for this indication is unclear. Methods The cost needed to treat to achieve a 1% reduction in body weight using semaglutide or liraglutide was calculated. The body weight reductions were extracted from the published STEP 1 trial and the SCALE trial results, respectively. A scenario analysis was performed to mitigate the primary differences between the two studies' populations. Drug costs were based on US GoodRx prices as of October 2022. Results Liraglutide in STEP 1 resulted in a weight loss of 5.4% (95% CI: 5%‐5.8%). Semaglutide in SCALE resulted in a weight loss of 12.4% (95% CI: 11.5%‐13.4%). The total cost of therapy with liraglutide during the trial was estimated at $17,585 compared with $22,878 with semaglutide. Accordingly, the cost needed to treat per 1% of body weight reduction with liraglutide is estimated at $3256 (95% CI: $3032‐$3517) compared with $1845 (95% CI: $1707‐$1989) with semaglutide. Conclusions Semaglutide provides significantly better value for money than liraglutide for weight reduction.
ISSN:1930-7381
1930-739X
DOI:10.1002/oby.23752