Feasibility of accelerated non-contrast-enhanced whole-heart bSSFP coronary MR angiography by deep learning–constrained compressed sensing

Objectives To examine a compressed sensing artificial intelligence (CSAI) framework to accelerate image acquisition in non-contrast-enhanced whole-heart bSSFP coronary magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. Methods Thirty healthy volunteers and 20 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2023-11, Vol.33 (11), p.8180-8190
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Xi, Tang, Lu, Li, Wanjiang, He, Shuai, Yue, Xun, Peng, Pengfei, Wu, Tao, Zhang, Xiaoyong, Wu, Zhigang, He, Yong, Chen, Yucheng, Huang, Juan, Sun, Jiayu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To examine a compressed sensing artificial intelligence (CSAI) framework to accelerate image acquisition in non-contrast-enhanced whole-heart bSSFP coronary magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. Methods Thirty healthy volunteers and 20 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) scheduled for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) were enrolled. Non-contrast-enhanced coronary MR angiography was performed with CSAI, compressed sensing (CS), and sensitivity encoding (SENSE) methods in healthy participants and with CSAI in patients. Acquisition time, subjective image quality score, and objective image quality measurement (blood pool homogeneity, signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], and contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) were compared among the three protocols. The diagnostic performance of CASI coronary MR angiography for predicting significant stenosis (≥ 50% diameter stenosis) on CCTA was evaluated. The Friedman test was performed to compare the three protocols. Results Acquisition time was significantly shorter in the CSAI and CS groups than in the SENSE group (10.2 ± 3.2 min vs. 10.9 ± 2.9 min vs. 13.0 ± 4.1 min, p  
ISSN:1432-1084
0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-023-09740-8