Hysteroscopic Fenestration with Precise Incision of the Cavity Septum: A Novel Minimally Invasive Surgery of Complete Septate Uterus with Double Cervix

This study aimed to develop and describe a novel surgical procedure that involves hysteroscopic fenestration with precise incision of the complete uterine septum and double cervix preservation after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation in patients and to evaluate its efficacy. A prospective c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 2023-09, Vol.30 (9), p.716-724
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Jialing, Sun, Lin, Qian, Huijun, Wu, Congquan, Jiang, Jiqin, Guo, Xiaolan, Gao, Shujun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to develop and describe a novel surgical procedure that involves hysteroscopic fenestration with precise incision of the complete uterine septum and double cervix preservation after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation in patients and to evaluate its efficacy. A prospective consecutive clinical study. A university teaching hospital. Twenty-four patients with complete septate uterus and double cervix. Three-dimensional reconstruction of uterus was performed with pelvic MRI and three-dimensional SPACE sequence scanning. Hysteroscopic fenestration with precise incision of the cavity septum and double cervix preservation was performed in patients. Three months after operation, follow-up pelvic MRI and second-look hysteroscopy were performed conventionally. Operating time, blood loss, operative complications, MRI and hysteroscopic changes of uterus, symptoms improvement, and reproductive outcomes were assessed. The surgery was successfully completed without any intraoperative complications in all patients. Operating time was 21.71 ± 8.28 minutes (range, 10–40 minutes) and blood loss was 9.92 ± 7.14 mL (range, 5–30 mL). Postoperative MRI showed the uterine anteroposterior diameter (3.66 cm vs 3.92 cm; p
ISSN:1553-4650
1553-4669
DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2023.05.005