Screening for distress and quality of life in pediatric patients after allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using a self-reporting instrument, blood stress biomarkers and an expert rating scale (PO-Bado)

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is highly distressing and potentially traumatizing for pediatric and young adult patients (PYAP). At present, there is little evidence on their individual burdens. In this prospective cohort study, the course of the psychological and somatic distress wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of psychosomatic research 2023-07, Vol.170, p.111358-111358, Article 111358
Hauptverfasser: Döring, Michaela, Dette, Anna Karina, Werle, Dustin, Jendritza, Ricarda, Malaval, Carmen, Thiel, Stefanie, Michaelis, Sebastian, Schlösser, Manuel, Lang, Peter, Handgretinger, Rupert, Svaldi, Jennifer, Cabanillas Stanchi, Karin Melanie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is highly distressing and potentially traumatizing for pediatric and young adult patients (PYAP). At present, there is little evidence on their individual burdens. In this prospective cohort study, the course of the psychological and somatic distress was investigated on eight observation days (day −8/−12, −5, 0 (day of HSCT), +10, +20, and + 30 before/after HSCT), using the PO-Bado external rating scale and the EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL self-assessment questionnaire. Stress-associated blood parameters were determined and correlated with the results of the questionnaires. A total of 64 PYAP with a median age of 9.1 years (range 0–26 years) who underwent autologous (n = 20; 31%; autoHSCT) or allogeneic (n = 44; 69%; alloHSCT) HSCT were analyzed. Both were associated with a significant reduction in QOL. The reduction in self-assessed QOL correlated with somatic and psychological distress as assessed by medical staff. While somatic distress was similar in both groups with a maximum around day+10 (alloHSCT 8.9 ± 2.4 vs. autoHSCT 9.1 ± 2.6; p = 0.69), a significantly higher level of psychological distress was seen during alloHSCT (e.g. day0 alloHSCT 5.3 ± 2.6 vs. day0 autoHSCT 3.2 ± 1.0; p 
ISSN:0022-3999
1879-1360
DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111358