Anterior cortical line of femur and tibia is more accurate than mid-shaft line to determine knee extension angle relative to sagittal mechanical axis during total knee arthroplasty

Accurate assessment of knee extension angle relative to sagittal mechanical axis (SMA) during TKA is usually obtained by computer navigation. Whether the lines along anterior cortex of distal femur and proximal tibia in short-knee imaging are accurate in determining knee extension angle has not been...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2024-05, Vol.29 (3), p.867-873
Hauptverfasser: Pongkunakorn, Anuwat, Jantharagsarangsee, Tharanas, Triamsasithorn, Parinthorn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Accurate assessment of knee extension angle relative to sagittal mechanical axis (SMA) during TKA is usually obtained by computer navigation. Whether the lines along anterior cortex of distal femur and proximal tibia in short-knee imaging are accurate in determining knee extension angle has not been investigated. A prospective study was conducted on 106 patients (116 knees) who underwent primary TKA. After complete anesthetization, the leg was elevated 30° and short-knee lateral fluoroscopy was performed. The angles between the anterior cortical line (ACL), and between the mid-shaft line (MSL) of the femur and tibia, were measured. After surgical exposure and bony registration into OrthoPilot navigation system, the leg was elevated again and degree of knee extension was recorded. The angles determined using three methods were compared. The mean extension angle observed by OrthoPilot (5.0° ± 6.8°, range −8°–25°) was not different from ACL method (5.3° ± 7.0°, range −8.1°–24.3°) (p = 0.811), but higher than MSL method (1.7° ± 7.1°, range −13.2°–18.1°) (p 
ISSN:0949-2658
1436-2023
DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2023.04.009