Effect of pharmacologic anti-atherosclerotic therapy on carotid intraplaque neovascularization: A systematic review

•Lipid-lowering therapy with statins or PCSK9i is associated with IPN regression.•Longer duration of statin therapy is associated with reduced carotid IPN.•No association between change in IPN and change in serum lipids/inflammatory markers.•Therapeutic IPN effects may represent a pathway distinct from serum lipid depletion. Intraplaque neovascularization (IPN), a key feature of vulnerable carotid plaque, is associated with adverse cardiovascular (CV) events. Statin therapy has been shown to diminish and stabilize atherosclerotic plaque, but its effect on IPN is uncertain. This review investigated the effects of common pharmacologic anti-atherosclerotic therapies on carotid IPN. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception until July 13, 2022. Studies evaluating the effect of anti-atherosclerotic therapy on carotid IPN among adults with carotid atherosclerosis were included. Sixteen studies were eligible for inclusion. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was the most common IPN assessment modality (n=8), followed by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) (n=4), excised plaque histology (n=3) and superb microvascular imaging (n=2). In fifteen studies, statins were the therapy of interest and one study assessed PCSK9 inhibitors. Among CEUS studies, baseline statin use was associated with a lower frequency of carotid IPN (median OR = 0.45). Prospective studies showed regression of IPN after 6-12 months of lipid-lowering therapy, with more regression observed in treated participants compared to untreated controls. Our findings suggest that lipid-lowering therapy with statins or PCSK9 inhibitors is associated with IPN regression. However, there was no correlation between change in IPN parameters and change in serum lipids and inflammatory markers in statin-treated participants, so it is unclear whether these factors are mediators in the observed IPN changes. Lastly, this review was limited by study heterogeneity and small sample sizes, so larger trials are needed to validate findings. [Display omitted]