Quality of life with cemiplimab plus chemotherapy for first‐line treatment of advanced non–small cell lung cancer: Patient‐reported outcomes from phase 3 EMPOWER‐Lung 3

Background EMPOWER‐Lung 3, a randomized 2:1 phase 3 trial, showed clinically meaningful and statistically significant overall survival improvement with cemiplimab plus platinum‐doublet chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for first‐line treatment of advanced non–small cell lung cancer. This...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2023-07, Vol.129 (14), p.2256-2265
Hauptverfasser: Makharadze, Tamta, Quek, Ruben G. W., Melkadze, Tamar, Gogishvili, Miranda, Ivanescu, Cristina, Giorgadze, Davit, Dvorkin, Mikhail, Penkov, Konstantin, Laktionov, Konstantin, Nemsadze, Gia, Nechaeva, Marina, Rozhkova, Irina, Kalinka, Ewa, Gessner, Christian, Moreno‐Jaime, Brizio, Passalacqua, Rodolfo, Konidaris, Gerasimos, Rietschel, Petra, Gullo, Giuseppe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background EMPOWER‐Lung 3, a randomized 2:1 phase 3 trial, showed clinically meaningful and statistically significant overall survival improvement with cemiplimab plus platinum‐doublet chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for first‐line treatment of advanced non–small cell lung cancer. This study evaluated patient‐reported outcomes (PROs). Methods PROs were assessed at day 1 (baseline), the start of each treatment cycle (every 3 weeks) for the first six doses, and then at start of every three cycles, using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life‐Core 30 (QLQ‐C30) and Quality of Life‐Lung Cancer Module (QLQ‐LC13) questionnaires. Prespecified analyses included a longitudinal mixed‐effect model comparing treatment arms and a time to definitive clinically meaningful deterioration (TTD) analysis performed for global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) and all scales from the questionnaires. Between‐arm TTD comparisons were made using a stratified log‐rank test and proportional hazards model. Results A total of 312 patients were assigned to receive cemiplimab plus platinum‐doublet chemotherapy and 154 to receive placebo plus chemotherapy; 391 (83.9%) were male and the median age was 63.0 years (range, 25–84). For pain symptoms (EORTC QLQ‐C30), a statistically significant overall improvement from baseline (−4.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] −8.36 to −1.60, p = .004) and a statistically significant delay in TTD (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.26–0.60, p 
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.34687