Chemoradiotherapy versus triplet chemotherapy as initial therapy for T4b esophageal cancer: survival results from a multicenter randomized Phase 2 trial

Background We report the long-term results as primary endpoint in a multicentre randomized prospective Phase 2 trial which compared chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and triplet chemotherapy (CT) as the initial therapy for conversion surgery (CS) in T4b esophageal cancer (EC). Methods Patients with T4b EC wer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of cancer 2023-07, Vol.129 (1), p.54-60
Hauptverfasser: Yamasaki, Makoto, Miyata, Hiroshi, Yamashita, Kotaro, Hamakawa, Takuya, Tanaka, Koji, Sugimura, Keijiro, Makino, Tomoki, Takeno, Atsushi, Shiraishi, Osamu, Motoori, Masaaki, Kimura, Yutaka, Hirao, Motohiro, Fujitani, Kazumasa, Yasuda, Takusi, Yano, Masahiko, Eguchi, Hidetoshi, Doki, Yuichiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background We report the long-term results as primary endpoint in a multicentre randomized prospective Phase 2 trial which compared chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and triplet chemotherapy (CT) as the initial therapy for conversion surgery (CS) in T4b esophageal cancer (EC). Methods Patients with T4b EC were randomly assigned to the CRT group or CT group as initial treatment. CS was performed if resectable after initial or secondary treatment. The primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival, analysed by intention-to-treat. Results The median follow-up period was 43.8 months. The 2-year survival rate was higher in the CRT group (55.1%; 95% CI: 41.1–68.3%) compared to the CT group (34.7%; 95% CI: 22.8–48.9%), although the difference was not significant ( P  = 0.11). Local and regional lymph node recurrence in patients undergoing R0 resection was significantly higher in the CT group compared to the CRT group (local: 30% versus 8%, respectively, P  = 0.03; regional: 37% versus 8%, respectively, P  = 0.002). Conclusions Upfront CT was not superior to upfront CRT as induction therapy for T4b EC in terms of 2-year survival and was significantly inferior to upfront CRT in terms of local and regional control. Registration The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (s051180164).
ISSN:0007-0920
1532-1827
1532-1827
DOI:10.1038/s41416-023-02286-y