A critical re‐evaluation of Mohs micrographic surgery for a facial basal cell carcinoma in older adults: Should we waive this treatment in certain patients?

Background Skin cancer incidences are increasing. Treatment for basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) can be questioned in certain patients. Treatment options are various, but Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has the highest cure rate. It is, however, time‐consuming and results in high logistical burden and t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2023-09, Vol.37 (9), p.1792-1798
Hauptverfasser: Van Coile, Laura, Brochez, Lieve, Verhaeghe, Evelien, Boone, Barbara, Meertens, Annick, Ongenae, Katia, Hoorens, Isabelle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Skin cancer incidences are increasing. Treatment for basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) can be questioned in certain patients. Treatment options are various, but Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has the highest cure rate. It is, however, time‐consuming and results in high logistical burden and treatment costs for both patients and society. Objectives This study critically re‐evaluates MMS for facial BCCs in older adults. The main objective is to examine all clinical, tumour and patient characteristics in relation to safety and survival to detect a subgroup in which MMS was not the best choice. The overall aim is to identify characteristics that support clinical decision‐making in daily practice. Methods Patients that received MMS between November 1998 and December 2012 were included. Only patients >75 years with a facial BCC were withheld for analysis. This is a retrospective cohort study, since evaluating the outcome of MMS in accordance with life expectancy is the main objective. Patient charts were evaluated towards comorbidities, complications and survival. Results This cohort comprises 207 patients. Median survival was 7.85 years. The age‐adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (aCCI) was divided into low/medium scores (aCCI
ISSN:0926-9959
1468-3083
DOI:10.1111/jdv.19158