Clinical implications of additional posterior fractures in combined anterior-posterior pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients

•Geriatric patients with pelvic ring fractures have combined anterior and posterior (A + P) fractures in 75.5% on routine CT-scan evaluation.•Routine CT-scanning of simple geriatric pelvic ring fractures is not needed.•Patients with combined A + P fractures have similar pain and ADL levels as patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2023-07, Vol.54 (7), p.110761-110761, Article 110761
Hauptverfasser: Timmer, R.A., Krijnen, P., van der Zwaal, P., Schipper, I.B., Meylaerts, S.A.G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110761
container_issue 7
container_start_page 110761
container_title Injury
container_volume 54
creator Timmer, R.A.
Krijnen, P.
van der Zwaal, P.
Schipper, I.B.
Meylaerts, S.A.G.
description •Geriatric patients with pelvic ring fractures have combined anterior and posterior (A + P) fractures in 75.5% on routine CT-scan evaluation.•Routine CT-scanning of simple geriatric pelvic ring fractures is not needed.•Patients with combined A + P fractures have similar pain and ADL levels as patients with isolated anterior fractures up to 1 year of follow-up.•Persisting pain and immobility after a period of conservative treatment may be indications for surgical fixation of geriatric pelvic ring fractures.•The majority of the geriatric patients recover to pre-injury pain and mobility levels when treated conservatively. Historically, pelvic ring fractures (PRF) are considered to occur predominantly in the anterior ring and therfore to be mechanically stable. Combined anterior and posterior (A + P) PRF are expected to be less mechanically stable and therefore to be associated with higher levels of pain and reduced mobility compared to isolated anterior fractures. The current study investigates the clinical relevance of combined A + P PRF in elderly patients. A prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted in patients >70 years of age with anterior PRF after low-energy trauma diagnosed on conventional radiographs. All patients underwent an additional CT-scan. Patients were divided into two groups; isolated anterior or combined A + P fractures. Patients were treated conservatively with adequate analgesia for at least one week. If patients could not be mobilised after conservative treatment, surgical fixation was performed. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, dependence on walking aids and Activities of Daily Living scores (ADL) were measured at 2–4 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months after fracture. 102 patients (age 81.1 ± 7.6 years) were included. Isolated anterior fractures were diagnosed in 25 (24.5%) and A + P fractures in 77 (75.5%) patients. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Most patients were successfully treated conservatively and 5 (4.9%) underwent percutaneous trans-iliac, trans-sacral screw fixation after failure of conservative treatment. At 2–4 weeks post trauma, patients with A + P fractures had similar median pain scores (3 (range 0–8) vs. 5 (0–10), p = 0.19) and ADL scores (85 (25–100) vs. 78.6 (5–100), p = 0.67), but were more dependent on walking aids (92.8% vs. 72.2%; p = 0.02) compared to patients with isolated anterior fractures. There were no significant differences at 3 months. At one year follow-up th
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.048
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2809547457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020138323003911</els_id><sourcerecordid>2809547457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-55a4e677b7689572eef1c81f6a5e2d01ee785afc2583f4da9330e60ebd6c3e513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9r3DAQxUVpabZJv0EpOvbizciyLO0lUJb-CQR6ac5CK42LFllyJDuwt370anGS0kthYEbMe_PQj5APDLYMWH993Pp4XPJp20LLt9DVUq_Ihim5a6Dt5WuyAWihYVzxC_KulCMAk8D5W3LBJeNS8n5Dfu-Dj96aQP04hTrMPsVC00CNc_78qKsplRmzT5kO2dh5yVioj9Sm8eAjOmrium7-CicMj97S7OOvf00YHOZwolNNwjiXK_JmMKHg-6d-Se6_fvm5_97c_fh2u_9811gu5NwIYTrspTzIXu2EbBEHZhUbeiOwdcAQpRJmsK1QfOic2XEO2AMeXG85CsYvyaf17pTTw4Jl1qMvFkMwEdNSdKtgJzrZCVml3Sq1OZWScdBT9qPJJ81An9nro17Z6zN7DV0tVW0fnxKWw4juxfQMuwpuVgHWfz56zLrYysCi8xntrF3y_0_4A08zm3I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2809547457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical implications of additional posterior fractures in combined anterior-posterior pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Timmer, R.A. ; Krijnen, P. ; van der Zwaal, P. ; Schipper, I.B. ; Meylaerts, S.A.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Timmer, R.A. ; Krijnen, P. ; van der Zwaal, P. ; Schipper, I.B. ; Meylaerts, S.A.G.</creatorcontrib><description>•Geriatric patients with pelvic ring fractures have combined anterior and posterior (A + P) fractures in 75.5% on routine CT-scan evaluation.•Routine CT-scanning of simple geriatric pelvic ring fractures is not needed.•Patients with combined A + P fractures have similar pain and ADL levels as patients with isolated anterior fractures up to 1 year of follow-up.•Persisting pain and immobility after a period of conservative treatment may be indications for surgical fixation of geriatric pelvic ring fractures.•The majority of the geriatric patients recover to pre-injury pain and mobility levels when treated conservatively. Historically, pelvic ring fractures (PRF) are considered to occur predominantly in the anterior ring and therfore to be mechanically stable. Combined anterior and posterior (A + P) PRF are expected to be less mechanically stable and therefore to be associated with higher levels of pain and reduced mobility compared to isolated anterior fractures. The current study investigates the clinical relevance of combined A + P PRF in elderly patients. A prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted in patients &gt;70 years of age with anterior PRF after low-energy trauma diagnosed on conventional radiographs. All patients underwent an additional CT-scan. Patients were divided into two groups; isolated anterior or combined A + P fractures. Patients were treated conservatively with adequate analgesia for at least one week. If patients could not be mobilised after conservative treatment, surgical fixation was performed. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, dependence on walking aids and Activities of Daily Living scores (ADL) were measured at 2–4 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months after fracture. 102 patients (age 81.1 ± 7.6 years) were included. Isolated anterior fractures were diagnosed in 25 (24.5%) and A + P fractures in 77 (75.5%) patients. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Most patients were successfully treated conservatively and 5 (4.9%) underwent percutaneous trans-iliac, trans-sacral screw fixation after failure of conservative treatment. At 2–4 weeks post trauma, patients with A + P fractures had similar median pain scores (3 (range 0–8) vs. 5 (0–10), p = 0.19) and ADL scores (85 (25–100) vs. 78.6 (5–100), p = 0.67), but were more dependent on walking aids (92.8% vs. 72.2%; p = 0.02) compared to patients with isolated anterior fractures. There were no significant differences at 3 months. At one year follow-up the median NRS pain and ADL scores for both fracture groups were 0 and 100, respectively. Mortality was 10.8%, and additional loss to follow-up was 17.6%. The vast majority of elderly patients with PRF have combined A + P fractures. The clinical implications of additional posterior pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients appears to be limited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.048</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37137736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Screws ; Cohort Studies ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging ; Fractures, Bone - surgery ; Fragility ; Geriatric ; Humans ; Osteoporosis ; Pain ; Pelvic Bones - injuries ; Pelvic fractures ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment stategies</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2023-07, Vol.54 (7), p.110761-110761, Article 110761</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-55a4e677b7689572eef1c81f6a5e2d01ee785afc2583f4da9330e60ebd6c3e513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7154-9514 ; 0000-0001-9952-3079 ; 0000-0003-1593-6293</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138323003911$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37137736$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Timmer, R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krijnen, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Zwaal, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, I.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meylaerts, S.A.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical implications of additional posterior fractures in combined anterior-posterior pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>•Geriatric patients with pelvic ring fractures have combined anterior and posterior (A + P) fractures in 75.5% on routine CT-scan evaluation.•Routine CT-scanning of simple geriatric pelvic ring fractures is not needed.•Patients with combined A + P fractures have similar pain and ADL levels as patients with isolated anterior fractures up to 1 year of follow-up.•Persisting pain and immobility after a period of conservative treatment may be indications for surgical fixation of geriatric pelvic ring fractures.•The majority of the geriatric patients recover to pre-injury pain and mobility levels when treated conservatively. Historically, pelvic ring fractures (PRF) are considered to occur predominantly in the anterior ring and therfore to be mechanically stable. Combined anterior and posterior (A + P) PRF are expected to be less mechanically stable and therefore to be associated with higher levels of pain and reduced mobility compared to isolated anterior fractures. The current study investigates the clinical relevance of combined A + P PRF in elderly patients. A prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted in patients &gt;70 years of age with anterior PRF after low-energy trauma diagnosed on conventional radiographs. All patients underwent an additional CT-scan. Patients were divided into two groups; isolated anterior or combined A + P fractures. Patients were treated conservatively with adequate analgesia for at least one week. If patients could not be mobilised after conservative treatment, surgical fixation was performed. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, dependence on walking aids and Activities of Daily Living scores (ADL) were measured at 2–4 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months after fracture. 102 patients (age 81.1 ± 7.6 years) were included. Isolated anterior fractures were diagnosed in 25 (24.5%) and A + P fractures in 77 (75.5%) patients. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Most patients were successfully treated conservatively and 5 (4.9%) underwent percutaneous trans-iliac, trans-sacral screw fixation after failure of conservative treatment. At 2–4 weeks post trauma, patients with A + P fractures had similar median pain scores (3 (range 0–8) vs. 5 (0–10), p = 0.19) and ADL scores (85 (25–100) vs. 78.6 (5–100), p = 0.67), but were more dependent on walking aids (92.8% vs. 72.2%; p = 0.02) compared to patients with isolated anterior fractures. There were no significant differences at 3 months. At one year follow-up the median NRS pain and ADL scores for both fracture groups were 0 and 100, respectively. Mortality was 10.8%, and additional loss to follow-up was 17.6%. The vast majority of elderly patients with PRF have combined A + P fractures. The clinical implications of additional posterior pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients appears to be limited.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Fragility</subject><subject>Geriatric</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pelvic Bones - injuries</subject><subject>Pelvic fractures</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment stategies</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9r3DAQxUVpabZJv0EpOvbizciyLO0lUJb-CQR6ac5CK42LFllyJDuwt370anGS0kthYEbMe_PQj5APDLYMWH993Pp4XPJp20LLt9DVUq_Ihim5a6Dt5WuyAWihYVzxC_KulCMAk8D5W3LBJeNS8n5Dfu-Dj96aQP04hTrMPsVC00CNc_78qKsplRmzT5kO2dh5yVioj9Sm8eAjOmrium7-CicMj97S7OOvf00YHOZwolNNwjiXK_JmMKHg-6d-Se6_fvm5_97c_fh2u_9811gu5NwIYTrspTzIXu2EbBEHZhUbeiOwdcAQpRJmsK1QfOic2XEO2AMeXG85CsYvyaf17pTTw4Jl1qMvFkMwEdNSdKtgJzrZCVml3Sq1OZWScdBT9qPJJ81An9nro17Z6zN7DV0tVW0fnxKWw4juxfQMuwpuVgHWfz56zLrYysCi8xntrF3y_0_4A08zm3I</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Timmer, R.A.</creator><creator>Krijnen, P.</creator><creator>van der Zwaal, P.</creator><creator>Schipper, I.B.</creator><creator>Meylaerts, S.A.G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7154-9514</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-3079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1593-6293</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Clinical implications of additional posterior fractures in combined anterior-posterior pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients</title><author>Timmer, R.A. ; Krijnen, P. ; van der Zwaal, P. ; Schipper, I.B. ; Meylaerts, S.A.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-55a4e677b7689572eef1c81f6a5e2d01ee785afc2583f4da9330e60ebd6c3e513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Fragility</topic><topic>Geriatric</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pelvic Bones - injuries</topic><topic>Pelvic fractures</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment stategies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Timmer, R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krijnen, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Zwaal, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schipper, I.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meylaerts, S.A.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Timmer, R.A.</au><au>Krijnen, P.</au><au>van der Zwaal, P.</au><au>Schipper, I.B.</au><au>Meylaerts, S.A.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical implications of additional posterior fractures in combined anterior-posterior pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>110761</spage><epage>110761</epage><pages>110761-110761</pages><artnum>110761</artnum><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>•Geriatric patients with pelvic ring fractures have combined anterior and posterior (A + P) fractures in 75.5% on routine CT-scan evaluation.•Routine CT-scanning of simple geriatric pelvic ring fractures is not needed.•Patients with combined A + P fractures have similar pain and ADL levels as patients with isolated anterior fractures up to 1 year of follow-up.•Persisting pain and immobility after a period of conservative treatment may be indications for surgical fixation of geriatric pelvic ring fractures.•The majority of the geriatric patients recover to pre-injury pain and mobility levels when treated conservatively. Historically, pelvic ring fractures (PRF) are considered to occur predominantly in the anterior ring and therfore to be mechanically stable. Combined anterior and posterior (A + P) PRF are expected to be less mechanically stable and therefore to be associated with higher levels of pain and reduced mobility compared to isolated anterior fractures. The current study investigates the clinical relevance of combined A + P PRF in elderly patients. A prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted in patients &gt;70 years of age with anterior PRF after low-energy trauma diagnosed on conventional radiographs. All patients underwent an additional CT-scan. Patients were divided into two groups; isolated anterior or combined A + P fractures. Patients were treated conservatively with adequate analgesia for at least one week. If patients could not be mobilised after conservative treatment, surgical fixation was performed. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, dependence on walking aids and Activities of Daily Living scores (ADL) were measured at 2–4 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months after fracture. 102 patients (age 81.1 ± 7.6 years) were included. Isolated anterior fractures were diagnosed in 25 (24.5%) and A + P fractures in 77 (75.5%) patients. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Most patients were successfully treated conservatively and 5 (4.9%) underwent percutaneous trans-iliac, trans-sacral screw fixation after failure of conservative treatment. At 2–4 weeks post trauma, patients with A + P fractures had similar median pain scores (3 (range 0–8) vs. 5 (0–10), p = 0.19) and ADL scores (85 (25–100) vs. 78.6 (5–100), p = 0.67), but were more dependent on walking aids (92.8% vs. 72.2%; p = 0.02) compared to patients with isolated anterior fractures. There were no significant differences at 3 months. At one year follow-up the median NRS pain and ADL scores for both fracture groups were 0 and 100, respectively. Mortality was 10.8%, and additional loss to follow-up was 17.6%. The vast majority of elderly patients with PRF have combined A + P fractures. The clinical implications of additional posterior pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients appears to be limited.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37137736</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.048</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7154-9514</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-3079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1593-6293</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1383
ispartof Injury, 2023-07, Vol.54 (7), p.110761-110761, Article 110761
issn 0020-1383
1879-0267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2809547457
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Activities of Daily Living
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Screws
Cohort Studies
Fracture Fixation, Internal
Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging
Fractures, Bone - surgery
Fragility
Geriatric
Humans
Osteoporosis
Pain
Pelvic Bones - injuries
Pelvic fractures
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Treatment stategies
title Clinical implications of additional posterior fractures in combined anterior-posterior pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A57%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20implications%20of%20additional%20posterior%20fractures%20in%20combined%20anterior-posterior%20pelvic%20ring%20fractures%20in%20elderly%20patients&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Timmer,%20R.A.&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=110761&rft.epage=110761&rft.pages=110761-110761&rft.artnum=110761&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2809547457%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2809547457&rft_id=info:pmid/37137736&rft_els_id=S0020138323003911&rfr_iscdi=true