Clinical implications of additional posterior fractures in combined anterior-posterior pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients
•Geriatric patients with pelvic ring fractures have combined anterior and posterior (A + P) fractures in 75.5% on routine CT-scan evaluation.•Routine CT-scanning of simple geriatric pelvic ring fractures is not needed.•Patients with combined A + P fractures have similar pain and ADL levels as patien...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Injury 2023-07, Vol.54 (7), p.110761-110761, Article 110761 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Geriatric patients with pelvic ring fractures have combined anterior and posterior (A + P) fractures in 75.5% on routine CT-scan evaluation.•Routine CT-scanning of simple geriatric pelvic ring fractures is not needed.•Patients with combined A + P fractures have similar pain and ADL levels as patients with isolated anterior fractures up to 1 year of follow-up.•Persisting pain and immobility after a period of conservative treatment may be indications for surgical fixation of geriatric pelvic ring fractures.•The majority of the geriatric patients recover to pre-injury pain and mobility levels when treated conservatively.
Historically, pelvic ring fractures (PRF) are considered to occur predominantly in the anterior ring and therfore to be mechanically stable. Combined anterior and posterior (A + P) PRF are expected to be less mechanically stable and therefore to be associated with higher levels of pain and reduced mobility compared to isolated anterior fractures. The current study investigates the clinical relevance of combined A + P PRF in elderly patients.
A prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted in patients >70 years of age with anterior PRF after low-energy trauma diagnosed on conventional radiographs. All patients underwent an additional CT-scan. Patients were divided into two groups; isolated anterior or combined A + P fractures. Patients were treated conservatively with adequate analgesia for at least one week. If patients could not be mobilised after conservative treatment, surgical fixation was performed. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, dependence on walking aids and Activities of Daily Living scores (ADL) were measured at 2–4 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months after fracture.
102 patients (age 81.1 ± 7.6 years) were included. Isolated anterior fractures were diagnosed in 25 (24.5%) and A + P fractures in 77 (75.5%) patients. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Most patients were successfully treated conservatively and 5 (4.9%) underwent percutaneous trans-iliac, trans-sacral screw fixation after failure of conservative treatment. At 2–4 weeks post trauma, patients with A + P fractures had similar median pain scores (3 (range 0–8) vs. 5 (0–10), p = 0.19) and ADL scores (85 (25–100) vs. 78.6 (5–100), p = 0.67), but were more dependent on walking aids (92.8% vs. 72.2%; p = 0.02) compared to patients with isolated anterior fractures. There were no significant differences at 3 months. At one year follow-up th |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-1383 1879-0267 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.048 |