Evidence-Based Classification for Post-bariatric Weight Regain from a Benchmark Registry Cohort of 18,403 Patients and Comparison with Current Criteria

Evidence-Based Classification for Post-bariatric Weight Regain from a Benchmark Registry Cohort of 18,403 Patients and Comparison with Current Criteria

Introduction There is a need for a standardized, evidence-based classification of post-bariatric weight-regain, to investigate and compare revision procedures and to advice and treat patients in an evidence-based way. Methods We used standard deviations (SD) of the highest (1–2 years) and latest (&g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obesity surgery 2023-07, Vol.33 (7), p.2040-2048
Hauptverfasser: Franken, R. J., de Laar, A. W. Van
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Benchmarking
Body mass index
Classification
Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus - surgery
Gastrectomy - methods
Gastric Bypass - methods
Gastrointestinal surgery
Humans
Laparoscopy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Obesity
Obesity - surgery
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Original Contributions
Patients
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Standard deviation
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Weight control
Weight Gain
Weight Loss
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction There is a need for a standardized, evidence-based classification of post-bariatric weight-regain, to investigate and compare revision procedures and to advice and treat patients in an evidence-based way. Methods We used standard deviations (SD) of the highest (1–2 years) and latest (> 2 years) percentage total weight loss (%TWL) results after primary bariatric surgery from the Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity (DATO) bariatric registry as benchmarks for (above) average (≥ − 1SD), poor (− 1SD to − 2SD) and insufficient (
ISSN:0960-8923
1708-0428
1708-0428
DOI:10.1007/s11695-023-06586-3