Utility of the coned-down lateral view of the lumbosacral spine

At certain institutions and radiology practices, a routine lumbar radiographic exam may include 3 views: AP, lateral, and coned-down lateral of the lumbosacral junction. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the third coned-down-lateral view adds significant diagnostic information regard...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical imaging 2023-08, Vol.100, p.10-14
Hauptverfasser: Fischer, Sarah, Friedman, Shari, Mardakhaev, Edward, Spiro, Ari, Sosner, Eitan, Ye, Kenny, Sprayregen, Seymour, Thornhill, Beverly
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:At certain institutions and radiology practices, a routine lumbar radiographic exam may include 3 views: AP, lateral, and coned-down lateral of the lumbosacral junction. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the third coned-down-lateral view adds significant diagnostic information regarding pathology at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels. This retrospective study includes patients (n = 74) who had a 3-view radiographic exam of the lumbar spine, as well as a CT or MRI within six months. The AP and lateral views were reviewed by three radiologists, both with and without the use of the third, coned-lateral view. Subsequently, the CT and MRI performed within 6 months was reviewed, and the results compared. The primary outcome was detection of abnormal alignment and disc disease at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels. For the combined findings of alignment and disc disease at each L4-L5 and L5-S1, there was disagreement between the 2-view and 3-view exams on 18 (of 296) evaluations. Of these 18, the 2-view and the 3-view exam each made positive findings on 9. By the binomial test, there is no evidence that either the 2-view or the 3-view exam tends to make more findings than the other (p = 1). Compared to CT/MRI, the 2-view exam agrees on 74.7 % of evaluations and the 3-view exam agrees on 75.3 %. There is therefore no evidence that the 3-view exam is more accurate than the 2-view exam. Elimination of the coned-down lateral view could reduce radiation exposure and imaging-related costs while maintaining diagnostic quality. •At many institutions, a 3-view radiographic exam of the LS spine consists of AP, lateral, and coned-lateral views.•Directly comparing 2-view and 3 view exams, inclusion of the coned-lateral view does not increase detection of LS pathology.•Addition of the third, coned-lateral view also does not improve accuracy of findings, when compared to CT/MRI imaging.•Elimination of the coned-lateral view can reduce radiation exposure and imaging costs while maintaining diagnostic quality.
ISSN:0899-7071
1873-4499
DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.04.013