Retrospective analysis of outcome and prognostic factors of subcutaneous mast cell tumours in dogs undergoing surgery with or without adjuvant treatment

Subcutaneous mast cell tumours (SC MCTs) can display a different biological behaviour in dogs when compared to their cutaneous counterpart. There is a paucity of information with regards to the outcome of dogs with SC MCTs treated with surgery and/or receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary & comparative oncology 2023-09, Vol.21 (3), p.437-446
Hauptverfasser: Treggiari, E., Valenti, P., Porcellato, I., Maresca, G., Romanelli, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Subcutaneous mast cell tumours (SC MCTs) can display a different biological behaviour in dogs when compared to their cutaneous counterpart. There is a paucity of information with regards to the outcome of dogs with SC MCTs treated with surgery and/or receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review the outcome of dogs with surgically excised SC MCTs undergoing adjuvant treatment or not. A secondary aim was to assess prognostic factors in the same group. Fifty‐two cases were included. Recurrence rate was 15% and 63% of evaluated lymph nodes were consistent with early or overt metastasis. Median survival time (range 83–1357 days) and median time to progression (range 14–1357 days) were not reached. Factors predictive of shorter overall survival time included increasing age (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06–1.55, p = .0092), presence of clinical signs at presentation (HR 10.44, 95% CI 2.69–40.52, p = .0007), mitotic count >4 (HR 8.69, 95% CI 2.55–29.55, p = 0.0005), presence of multinucleation (HR 4.21, 95% CI 1.35–13.18, p = .0135), use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 7.16, 95% CI 1.26–40.73, p = .0266). The same factors, together with increasing tumour dimensions, were predictive for shorter progression‐free survival (PFS), including increasing age (p = .0012), presence of clinical signs at presentation (p = .0045), increasing tumour dimensions (p = .0004), MC > 4 (p = .0004), presence of multinucleation (p = .0282), use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (p = .0485). No variables remained significant for overall survival using multivariate analysis. There was a longer survival in cases where chemotherapy was not required (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03–0.68, p = .0148), and this variable remained significant for PFS on multivariate analysis (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02–0.76, p = .02). In conclusion, our study suggests that dogs with SC MCTs, in the absence of negative prognostic factors, may have a prolonged survival when treated with surgery alone. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of adjuvant treatment for biologically aggressive SC MCTs in dogs.
ISSN:1476-5810
1476-5829
DOI:10.1111/vco.12902