Amphotericin B, itraconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole MICs against clinical Mucorales isolates obtained by visual inspection and spectrophotometric reading according to the EUCAST 9.4 procedure

Abstract We compared the antifungal susceptibility of 92 Mucorales isolates obtained by visual inspection and spectrophotometric readings following EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) testing. Amphotericin B minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were up to 1 mg/l a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical mycology (Oxford) 2023-04, Vol.61 (5)
Hauptverfasser: Escribano, Pilar, Mesquida, Aina, López-Montesinos, Sara, Reigadas, Elena, Muñoz, Patricia, Guinea, Jesús
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract We compared the antifungal susceptibility of 92 Mucorales isolates obtained by visual inspection and spectrophotometric readings following EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) testing. Amphotericin B minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were up to 1 mg/l against most isolates and variable among species, except for Cunninghamella bertholletiae. Posaconazole MICs against most isolates were up to 1 mg/l and high against Mucor circinelloides, some Rhizopus arrhizus, and Rhizopus microsporus. Isavuconazole MICs ranged between 1 and 8 mg/l but were invariably >8 mg/l against M. circinelloides and C. bertholletiae. The agreement between MICs obtained by visual endpoint or spectrophotometric readings was moderate and higher when using the ≥90% fungal growth inhibition endpoint. Lay Summary The agreement between minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values obtained by visual inspection or spectrophotometric readings was moderate and higher when the ≥90% fungal growth inhibition endpoint was chosen. Isavuconazole presented higher MICs than posaconazole, regardless of the inhibition endpoint used.
ISSN:1369-3786
1460-2709
DOI:10.1093/mmy/myad045