Nutrient uptake in supplemented substrate by oyster mushroom

Spent mushroom substrate (SMS) is a promising alternative for supplementing oyster mushroom substrate, replacing conventional cereal bran. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the production of Pleurotus ostreatus supplemented with Lentinula edodes’ SMS, through the nutritional analysis of the s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of microbiology & biotechnology 2023-07, Vol.39 (7), p.175-175, Article 175
Hauptverfasser: Lucas de Jesus, Gabriel, José Lavoranti, Osmir, Schafer, Gilmar, Dias de Oliveira, Gabriel, Scheffer de Andrade Silva, Ricardo, Lorena Cuquel, Francine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Spent mushroom substrate (SMS) is a promising alternative for supplementing oyster mushroom substrate, replacing conventional cereal bran. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the production of Pleurotus ostreatus supplemented with Lentinula edodes’ SMS, through the nutritional analysis of the substrate. Wheat straw was used as substrate and supplemented with rice bran (RB) or SMS in 0%, 7%,15% and 30%. Ca, K, Mg, Mn, Zn, Cu and Fe contents of the cultivation substrates (before and after harvest) were determined through atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Mycelial growth (cm²/day), mycelial time colonization (days), number of clusters, number of pileus, average clusters weight (g), pileus lenght (cm) and width (cm), productivity (1st, 2nd and 3rd flush) (%), biological efficiency (%) of mushrooms were evaluated. Results indicated mycelial growth was higher (0.87 cm²/day compared to the Control) when the substrate was supplemented regardless of the source. The proportions of 15% of SMS achieved the highest biological efficiency (107% − 15% SMS versus 66% - Control). The only nutrients that showed differences in absorption were Ca, K and Mn, in which substrates supplemented with SMS had greater absorption of Ca (5.37 g.kg − 1 versus 1.94 g.kg − 1 in Control) while substrates supplemented with RB absorbed more K (6.56 g.kg − 1 versus 3.74 g.kg − 1 in Control). The mineral composition of the substrate has a direct impact on the growth and yield of P. ostreatus , highlighting the potential of SMS as a alternative to traditional bran supplementation.
ISSN:0959-3993
1573-0972
DOI:10.1007/s11274-023-03622-3