Optimal concentration of Lugol's solution for detecting early esophageal carcinoma: A randomized controlled trial

Background and Aim Lugol chromoendoscopy is the standard technique to detect an esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, a high concentration of Lugol's solution can induce mucosal injury and adverse events. We aimed to investigate the optimal concentration of Lugol's solution t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2023-06, Vol.38 (6), p.962-969
Hauptverfasser: Qu, Jun‐yan, Li, Yan, Liu, Guan‐qun, Li, Zhen, Zhong, Ning, Zhang, Ming‐ming, Li, Yue‐yue, Yu, Tao, Lu, Xue‐feng, Li, Li‐xiang, Liu, Han, Qi, Qing‐qing, Li, Yan‐qing, Zuo, Xiu‐li
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Aim Lugol chromoendoscopy is the standard technique to detect an esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, a high concentration of Lugol's solution can induce mucosal injury and adverse events. We aimed to investigate the optimal concentration of Lugol's solution to reduce mucosal injury and adverse events without degrading image quality. Methods This was a two‐phase double‐blind randomized controlled trial. In phase I, 200 eligible patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and then were randomly (1:1:1:1:1) sprayed with 1.2%, 1.0%, 0.8%, 0.6%, or 0.4% Lugol's solution. Image quality, gastric mucosal injury, adverse events, and operation satisfaction were compared to investigate the minimal effective concentration. In phase II, 42 cases of endoscopic mucosectomy for early ESCC were included. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the minimal effective (0.6%) or conventional (1.2%) concentration of Lugol's solution for further comparison of the effectiveness. Results In phase I, the gastric mucosal injury was significantly reduced in 0.6% group (P 
ISSN:0815-9319
1440-1746
DOI:10.1111/jgh.16190