Weakly-Supervised 3D Medical Image Segmentation using Geometric Prior and Contrastive Similarity

Medical image segmentation is almost the most important pre-processing procedure in computer-aided diagnosis but is also a very challenging task due to the complex shapes of segments and various artifacts caused by medical imaging, ( i.e ., low-contrast tissues, and non-homogenous textures). In this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on medical imaging 2023-10, Vol.PP (10), p.1-1
Hauptverfasser: Du, Hao, Dong, Qihua, Xu, Yan, Liao, Jing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Medical image segmentation is almost the most important pre-processing procedure in computer-aided diagnosis but is also a very challenging task due to the complex shapes of segments and various artifacts caused by medical imaging, ( i.e ., low-contrast tissues, and non-homogenous textures). In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective segmentation framework that incorporates the geometric prior and contrastive similarity into the weakly-supervised segmentation framework in a loss-based fashion. The proposed geometric prior built on point cloud provides meticulous geometry to the weakly-supervised segmentation proposal, which serves as better supervision than the inherent property of the bounding-box annotation ( i.e ., height and width). Furthermore, we propose the contrastive similarity to encourage organ pixels to gather around in the contrastive embedding space, which helps better distinguish low-contrast tissues. The proposed contrastive embedding space can make up for the poor representation of the conventionally-used gray space. Extensive experiments are conducted to verify the effectiveness and the robustness of the proposed weakly-supervised segmentation framework. The proposed framework are superior to state-of-the-art weakly-supervised methods on the following publicly accessible datasets: LiTS 2017 Challenge, KiTS 2021 Challenge and LPBA40. We also dissect our method and evaluate the performance of each component.
ISSN:0278-0062
1558-254X
DOI:10.1109/TMI.2023.3269523