Time to Diagnosis and Birth Outcomes of Pregnancy-onset IBD
Abstract Background Pregnancy-onset inflammatory bowel disease (PO-IBD) may pose a clinical challenge. We investigated the clinical course of PO-IBD, including time to diagnosis, medical treatment, and the impact on birth outcomes. Methods All pregnancies in women with IBD at a tertiary IBD center i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Inflammatory bowel diseases 2024-02, Vol.30 (2), p.222-229 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background
Pregnancy-onset inflammatory bowel disease (PO-IBD) may pose a clinical challenge. We investigated the clinical course of PO-IBD, including time to diagnosis, medical treatment, and the impact on birth outcomes.
Methods
All pregnancies in women with IBD at a tertiary IBD center in Denmark were identified from 2008 to 2021. Maternal and offspring outcome data, retrieved from medical records of women with new onset IBD during pregnancy, were compared with the outcomes of women with IBD diagnosed prior to pregnancy (controls). Outcomes included subtype of IBD, disease location, medical treatment, birth weight, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), gestational age at birth, caesarean section, stillbirth, congenital malformations, and time elapsed from onset of symptoms to diagnosis.
Results
In total, 378 women contributed with 583 pregnancies. Pregnancy-onset IBD affected 34 (9.0%) women. Ulcerative colitis (UC; n = 32) was more prevalent than Chron’s disease (CD; n = 2). Birth outcomes in pregnancies affected by PO-IBD were comparable to that of the 549 controls. Women with PO-IBD received more corticosteroids and biologics following their diagnosis than did the controls (5 [14.7%] vs 2 [2.9%]; P = .07; and 14 [41.2%] vs 9 [13.2%]; P = .003, respectively). Concerning time to IBD diagnosis, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (PO-IBD, 2.5 months, interquartile range [2-6] vs controls 2 months [1-4.5]; P = .27).
Conclusion
Although we observed a trend towards a diagnostic delay, PO-IBD was not associated with a significantly increased time to diagnosis. Birth outcomes in women with PO-IBD were comparable to those diagnosed with IBD prior to pregnancy.
Lay Summary
Pregnancy-Onset IBD (PO-IBD) is rare and can be difficult to diagnose. The present study however reveals no significant difference in time-to-diagnosis between women with PO-IBD and women diagnosed with IBD while not pregnant.
Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-0998 1536-4844 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ibd/izad059 |