Clinical validation of methylation biomarkers for optimal detection of high‐grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia

The precursor lesions of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) include human papillomavirus (HPV)‐associated and HPV‐independent squamous neoplasia with a varying cancer risk. Our study aimed to validate the accuracy of previously identified DNA methylation markers for detection of such high‐grade v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 2023-08, Vol.153 (4), p.783-791
Hauptverfasser: Voss, Féline O., Thuijs, Nikki B., Duin, Sylvia, Özer, Müjde, Beurden, Marc, Berkhof, Johannes, Steenbergen, Renske D. M., Bleeker, Maaike C. G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The precursor lesions of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) include human papillomavirus (HPV)‐associated and HPV‐independent squamous neoplasia with a varying cancer risk. Our study aimed to validate the accuracy of previously identified DNA methylation markers for detection of such high‐grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN). A large clinical series of 751 vulvar lesions, originally diagnosed as high‐grade VIN, were reassessed and categorized into HPV‐associated or HPV‐independent vulvar disease categories. Together with 113 healthy vulvar controls, all samples were tested for 12 methylation markers with quantitative multiplex methylation‐specific PCR (qMSP). Performance of individual markers and selection of an optimal marker panel for detection of high‐grade VIN was determined by logistic regression analysis. SST was the best‐performing individual marker (AUC 0.90), detecting 80% of high‐grade VIN cases, with excellent detection of HPV‐independent VIN (95%), known to have the highest cancer risk. Merely 2% of controls tested methylation positive for SST. Selection of a marker panel, including ZNF582, SST and miR124‐2, resulted in a comparably high accuracy for detection of high‐grade VIN (AUC 0.89). In conclusion, we clinically validated the accuracy of 12 DNA methylation markers for detection of high‐grade VIN. SST, as a sole marker or in a panel, provides an optimal diagnostic tool to distinguish high‐grade VIN in need of treatment, particularly HPV‐independent VIN, from low‐grade or reactive vulvar lesions. These findings warrant further prognostic validation of methylation biomarkers for cancer risk stratification of patients with VIN. What's new? Only a minority of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia progress to cancer, and objective molecular biomarkers that reflect the cancer risk in patients are currently needed. Our study on more than 800 specimens validates the accuracy of 12 previously identified DNA methylation markers for detection of high‐grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. SST, as a sole marker or in a panel, provides an optimal diagnostic tool to distinguish high‐grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia in need of treatment from low‐grade or reactive vulvar lesions. Identification of vulvar lesions with a high cancer risk by methylation markers can contribute to personalized patient management and prevent mutilating overtreatment.
ISSN:0020-7136
1097-0215
DOI:10.1002/ijc.34537