Fast changes in default and control network activity underlying intraindividual response time variability in childhood: Does age and sex matter?
Intraindividual response time variability (RTV) is considered as a general marker of neurological health. In adults, the central executive and salience networks (task‐positive networks, TPN) and the default mode network (DMN) are critical for RTV. Given that RTV decreases with growing up, and that b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Developmental psychobiology 2023-05, Vol.65 (4), p.e22382-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e22382 |
container_title | Developmental psychobiology |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Privodnova, Evgeniya Yu Slobodskaya, Helena R. Savostyanov, Alexander N. Bocharov, Andrey V. Saprigyn, Alexander E. Knyazev, Gennady G. |
description | Intraindividual response time variability (RTV) is considered as a general marker of neurological health. In adults, the central executive and salience networks (task‐positive networks, TPN) and the default mode network (DMN) are critical for RTV. Given that RTV decreases with growing up, and that boys are likely somewhat behind girls with respect to the network development, we aimed to clarify age and sex effects. Electroencephalogram was recorded during Stroop‐like test performance in 124 typically developing children aged 5–12 years. Network fluctuations were calculated as changes of current source density (CSD) in regions of interest (ROIs) from pretest to 1‐s test interval. In boys, TPN activation (CSD increase in ROIs included in the TPN) was associated with lower RTV, suggesting a greater engagement of attentional control. In children younger than 9.5 years, higher response stability was associated with the predominance of TPN activation over DMN activation (CSD increase in ROIs included in the TPN > that in the DMN); this predominance increased with age, suggesting that variability among younger children may be due to network immaturity. These findings suggest that the TPN and DMN may play different roles within the network mechanisms of RTV in boys and girls and at different developmental stages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/dev.22382 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2803329034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2803329034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-768d4742a38064469951d339dfb5aec0299585c5cc8da109ba88a38a664a88813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctOHDEQRa0oKEwgi_xA5GWyaPCjH-5soohHgoTEBti2auyaGSdue2K7B-Yv-OQYBtixsl0-dUqqS8hnzo44Y-LY4OZICKnEOzLjrFeVkEy8JzPGuKh4K9k--ZjSn_Lkteo-kH3ZsU42PZuRh3NImeoV-CUmaj01uIDJZQreUB18jsFRj_kuxL8UdLYbm7d08gaj21q_LC05gvWmfJgJHI2Y1sEnpNmOSDcQLcyte2wqcr2yzqxCMN_paSjzYIlPgxLe0xFyxvjjkOwtwCX89HwekJvzs-uT39Xl1a-Lk5-XlZaiEVXXKlN3tQCpWFvXbd833EjZm8W8AdRMlIJqdKO1MlB2MgelCgttW5eb4vKAfN151zH8mzDlYbRJo3PgMUxpEIpJKXom64J-26E6hpQiLoZ1tCPE7cDZ8BjAUAIYngIo7Jdn7TQf0bySLxsvwPEOuLMOt2-bhtOz253yP6-mkV8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2803329034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fast changes in default and control network activity underlying intraindividual response time variability in childhood: Does age and sex matter?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Privodnova, Evgeniya Yu ; Slobodskaya, Helena R. ; Savostyanov, Alexander N. ; Bocharov, Andrey V. ; Saprigyn, Alexander E. ; Knyazev, Gennady G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Privodnova, Evgeniya Yu ; Slobodskaya, Helena R. ; Savostyanov, Alexander N. ; Bocharov, Andrey V. ; Saprigyn, Alexander E. ; Knyazev, Gennady G.</creatorcontrib><description>Intraindividual response time variability (RTV) is considered as a general marker of neurological health. In adults, the central executive and salience networks (task‐positive networks, TPN) and the default mode network (DMN) are critical for RTV. Given that RTV decreases with growing up, and that boys are likely somewhat behind girls with respect to the network development, we aimed to clarify age and sex effects. Electroencephalogram was recorded during Stroop‐like test performance in 124 typically developing children aged 5–12 years. Network fluctuations were calculated as changes of current source density (CSD) in regions of interest (ROIs) from pretest to 1‐s test interval. In boys, TPN activation (CSD increase in ROIs included in the TPN) was associated with lower RTV, suggesting a greater engagement of attentional control. In children younger than 9.5 years, higher response stability was associated with the predominance of TPN activation over DMN activation (CSD increase in ROIs included in the TPN > that in the DMN); this predominance increased with age, suggesting that variability among younger children may be due to network immaturity. These findings suggest that the TPN and DMN may play different roles within the network mechanisms of RTV in boys and girls and at different developmental stages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2302</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dev.22382</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37073590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Brain ; Brain Mapping ; Child ; children ; control networks ; default network ; Female ; Humans ; intraindividual response time variability ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Nerve Net ; Reaction Time ; sex differences</subject><ispartof>Developmental psychobiology, 2023-05, Vol.65 (4), p.e22382-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-768d4742a38064469951d339dfb5aec0299585c5cc8da109ba88a38a664a88813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-768d4742a38064469951d339dfb5aec0299585c5cc8da109ba88a38a664a88813</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0479-3816</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fdev.22382$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fdev.22382$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37073590$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Privodnova, Evgeniya Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slobodskaya, Helena R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savostyanov, Alexander N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bocharov, Andrey V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saprigyn, Alexander E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knyazev, Gennady G.</creatorcontrib><title>Fast changes in default and control network activity underlying intraindividual response time variability in childhood: Does age and sex matter?</title><title>Developmental psychobiology</title><addtitle>Dev Psychobiol</addtitle><description>Intraindividual response time variability (RTV) is considered as a general marker of neurological health. In adults, the central executive and salience networks (task‐positive networks, TPN) and the default mode network (DMN) are critical for RTV. Given that RTV decreases with growing up, and that boys are likely somewhat behind girls with respect to the network development, we aimed to clarify age and sex effects. Electroencephalogram was recorded during Stroop‐like test performance in 124 typically developing children aged 5–12 years. Network fluctuations were calculated as changes of current source density (CSD) in regions of interest (ROIs) from pretest to 1‐s test interval. In boys, TPN activation (CSD increase in ROIs included in the TPN) was associated with lower RTV, suggesting a greater engagement of attentional control. In children younger than 9.5 years, higher response stability was associated with the predominance of TPN activation over DMN activation (CSD increase in ROIs included in the TPN > that in the DMN); this predominance increased with age, suggesting that variability among younger children may be due to network immaturity. These findings suggest that the TPN and DMN may play different roles within the network mechanisms of RTV in boys and girls and at different developmental stages.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>control networks</subject><subject>default network</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intraindividual response time variability</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nerve Net</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>sex differences</subject><issn>0012-1630</issn><issn>1098-2302</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctOHDEQRa0oKEwgi_xA5GWyaPCjH-5soohHgoTEBti2auyaGSdue2K7B-Yv-OQYBtixsl0-dUqqS8hnzo44Y-LY4OZICKnEOzLjrFeVkEy8JzPGuKh4K9k--ZjSn_Lkteo-kH3ZsU42PZuRh3NImeoV-CUmaj01uIDJZQreUB18jsFRj_kuxL8UdLYbm7d08gaj21q_LC05gvWmfJgJHI2Y1sEnpNmOSDcQLcyte2wqcr2yzqxCMN_paSjzYIlPgxLe0xFyxvjjkOwtwCX89HwekJvzs-uT39Xl1a-Lk5-XlZaiEVXXKlN3tQCpWFvXbd833EjZm8W8AdRMlIJqdKO1MlB2MgelCgttW5eb4vKAfN151zH8mzDlYbRJo3PgMUxpEIpJKXom64J-26E6hpQiLoZ1tCPE7cDZ8BjAUAIYngIo7Jdn7TQf0bySLxsvwPEOuLMOt2-bhtOz253yP6-mkV8</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Privodnova, Evgeniya Yu</creator><creator>Slobodskaya, Helena R.</creator><creator>Savostyanov, Alexander N.</creator><creator>Bocharov, Andrey V.</creator><creator>Saprigyn, Alexander E.</creator><creator>Knyazev, Gennady G.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0479-3816</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Fast changes in default and control network activity underlying intraindividual response time variability in childhood: Does age and sex matter?</title><author>Privodnova, Evgeniya Yu ; Slobodskaya, Helena R. ; Savostyanov, Alexander N. ; Bocharov, Andrey V. ; Saprigyn, Alexander E. ; Knyazev, Gennady G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-768d4742a38064469951d339dfb5aec0299585c5cc8da109ba88a38a664a88813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>control networks</topic><topic>default network</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intraindividual response time variability</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nerve Net</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>sex differences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Privodnova, Evgeniya Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slobodskaya, Helena R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savostyanov, Alexander N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bocharov, Andrey V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saprigyn, Alexander E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knyazev, Gennady G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Developmental psychobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Privodnova, Evgeniya Yu</au><au>Slobodskaya, Helena R.</au><au>Savostyanov, Alexander N.</au><au>Bocharov, Andrey V.</au><au>Saprigyn, Alexander E.</au><au>Knyazev, Gennady G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fast changes in default and control network activity underlying intraindividual response time variability in childhood: Does age and sex matter?</atitle><jtitle>Developmental psychobiology</jtitle><addtitle>Dev Psychobiol</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e22382</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e22382-n/a</pages><issn>0012-1630</issn><eissn>1098-2302</eissn><abstract>Intraindividual response time variability (RTV) is considered as a general marker of neurological health. In adults, the central executive and salience networks (task‐positive networks, TPN) and the default mode network (DMN) are critical for RTV. Given that RTV decreases with growing up, and that boys are likely somewhat behind girls with respect to the network development, we aimed to clarify age and sex effects. Electroencephalogram was recorded during Stroop‐like test performance in 124 typically developing children aged 5–12 years. Network fluctuations were calculated as changes of current source density (CSD) in regions of interest (ROIs) from pretest to 1‐s test interval. In boys, TPN activation (CSD increase in ROIs included in the TPN) was associated with lower RTV, suggesting a greater engagement of attentional control. In children younger than 9.5 years, higher response stability was associated with the predominance of TPN activation over DMN activation (CSD increase in ROIs included in the TPN > that in the DMN); this predominance increased with age, suggesting that variability among younger children may be due to network immaturity. These findings suggest that the TPN and DMN may play different roles within the network mechanisms of RTV in boys and girls and at different developmental stages.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>37073590</pmid><doi>10.1002/dev.22382</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0479-3816</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-1630 |
ispartof | Developmental psychobiology, 2023-05, Vol.65 (4), p.e22382-n/a |
issn | 0012-1630 1098-2302 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2803329034 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Adult Attention - physiology Brain Brain Mapping Child children control networks default network Female Humans intraindividual response time variability Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Nerve Net Reaction Time sex differences |
title | Fast changes in default and control network activity underlying intraindividual response time variability in childhood: Does age and sex matter? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T09%3A49%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fast%20changes%20in%20default%20and%20control%20network%20activity%20underlying%20intraindividual%20response%20time%20variability%20in%20childhood:%20Does%20age%20and%20sex%20matter?&rft.jtitle=Developmental%20psychobiology&rft.au=Privodnova,%20Evgeniya%20Yu&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e22382&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e22382-n/a&rft.issn=0012-1630&rft.eissn=1098-2302&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dev.22382&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2803329034%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2803329034&rft_id=info:pmid/37073590&rfr_iscdi=true |