Fast changes in default and control network activity underlying intraindividual response time variability in childhood: Does age and sex matter?

Intraindividual response time variability (RTV) is considered as a general marker of neurological health. In adults, the central executive and salience networks (task‐positive networks, TPN) and the default mode network (DMN) are critical for RTV. Given that RTV decreases with growing up, and that b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Developmental psychobiology 2023-05, Vol.65 (4), p.e22382-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Privodnova, Evgeniya Yu, Slobodskaya, Helena R., Savostyanov, Alexander N., Bocharov, Andrey V., Saprigyn, Alexander E., Knyazev, Gennady G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Intraindividual response time variability (RTV) is considered as a general marker of neurological health. In adults, the central executive and salience networks (task‐positive networks, TPN) and the default mode network (DMN) are critical for RTV. Given that RTV decreases with growing up, and that boys are likely somewhat behind girls with respect to the network development, we aimed to clarify age and sex effects. Electroencephalogram was recorded during Stroop‐like test performance in 124 typically developing children aged 5–12 years. Network fluctuations were calculated as changes of current source density (CSD) in regions of interest (ROIs) from pretest to 1‐s test interval. In boys, TPN activation (CSD increase in ROIs included in the TPN) was associated with lower RTV, suggesting a greater engagement of attentional control. In children younger than 9.5 years, higher response stability was associated with the predominance of TPN activation over DMN activation (CSD increase in ROIs included in the TPN > that in the DMN); this predominance increased with age, suggesting that variability among younger children may be due to network immaturity. These findings suggest that the TPN and DMN may play different roles within the network mechanisms of RTV in boys and girls and at different developmental stages.
ISSN:0012-1630
1098-2302
DOI:10.1002/dev.22382