Analgesic efficacy of theta-burst stimulation for postoperative pain

•We evaluated the efficacy of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) in postoperative care across two cortical targets.•iTBS reduced anaesthetic pump attempts.•This effect was unique to DLPFC stimulation while M1 had no effect. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may be a releva...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical neurophysiology 2023-05, Vol.149, p.81-87
Hauptverfasser: Cheng, Ming, Che, Xianwei, Ye, Yang, He, Changlin, Yu, Liang, Lv, Yating, Fitzgerald, Paul B., Cash, Robin F.H., Fitzgibbon, Bernadette M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We evaluated the efficacy of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) in postoperative care across two cortical targets.•iTBS reduced anaesthetic pump attempts.•This effect was unique to DLPFC stimulation while M1 had no effect. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may be a relevant method to assist postoperative pain. However, studies to date have only used conventional 10 Hz rTMS and targeted the DLPFC for postoperative pain. A more recent form of rTMS, termed intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS), enables to increase cortical excitability in a short period of time. This preliminary double-blind, randomised, sham controlled study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of iTBS in postoperative care across two distinct stimulation targets. A group of 45 patients post laparoscopic surgery were randomised to receive a single session of iTBS over either the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), primary motor cortex (M1), or Sham stimulation (1:1:1 ratio). Outcome measurements were number of pump attempts, total anaesthetic volume used, and self-rated pain experience, assessed at 1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours post stimulation. All randomised patients were analysed (n = 15 in each group). Compared to Sham stimulation, DLPFC-iTBS reduced pump attempts at 6 (DLPFC = 0.73 ± 0.88, Sham = 2.36 ± 1.65, P = 0.031), 24 (DLPFC = 1.40 ± 1.24, Sham = 5.03 ± 3.87, P = 0.008), and 48 (DLPFC = 1.47 ± 1.41, Sham = 5.87 ± 4.34, P = 0.014) hours post-surgery, whereby M1 stimulation had no effect. No group effect was observed on total anaesthetics, which was mainly provided through the continuous administration of opioids at a set speed for each group. There was also no group or interaction effect on pain ratings. Pump attempts were positively associated with pain ratings in the DLPFC (r = 0.59, P = 0.02) and M1 (r = 0.56, P = 0.03) stimulation. Our findings show that iTBS to the DLPFC reduces pump attempts for additional anaesthetics following a laparoscopic surgery. However, reduced pump attempts by DLPFC stimulation did not translate into a significantly smaller volume of total anaesthetic, due to the continuous administration of opioids at a set speed for each group. Our findings therefore provide preliminary evidence for iTBS targeting the DLPFC to be used to improve postoperative pain management.
ISSN:1388-2457
1872-8952
DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2023.02.174