Comparison of safety and efficacy of one shot dilation vs. gradual dilation technique in supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of gradual dilation (GD) and one-shot dilation (OSD) techniques in patients who underwent supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Methods The data of 176 patients who underwent supine PCNL were reviewed. Eighty-seven patients who underwent OSD were defi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of urology 2023-06, Vol.41 (6), p.1659-1666 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To compare the efficacy and safety of gradual dilation (GD) and one-shot dilation (OSD) techniques in patients who underwent supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Methods
The data of 176 patients who underwent supine PCNL were reviewed. Eighty-seven patients who underwent OSD were defined as group 1, and 89 patients who underwent GD were defined as group 2. Both surgical techniques were compared with each other in terms of various parameters. Then, regression analysis of factors predicting stone-free status and complications in patients who underwent supine PNL were performed. Then, regression analysis of factors predicting success rate and complications in patients who underwent supine PNL were performed.
Results
No statistical difference was found in terms of stone-free rate, Clavien–Dindo complication grade and operation time. No statistical difference was found in terms of success rate, Clavien–Dindo complication grade and operation time. However, the fluoroscopy time was found to be significantly shorter in group 1 (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1433-8726 0724-4983 1433-8726 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00345-023-04393-0 |