A randomized controlled trial to examine the effect of the Pediatric Opioid Analgesia Self‐Instruction System (PedOASIS) tool on pediatric hematology/oncology trainee education

Background Many children with hematologic and oncologic diagnoses require opioids for management of pain, yet knowledge gaps persist among pediatric hematology/oncology (PHO) fellows. Objective Pediatric Opioid Analgesia Self‐Instruction System (PedOASIS) is an interactive, case‐based education tool...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric blood & cancer 2023-06, Vol.70 (6), p.e30305-n/a
Hauptverfasser: MacDonell‐Yilmaz, Rebecca E., Murillo, Anarina, Welch, Jennifer G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Many children with hematologic and oncologic diagnoses require opioids for management of pain, yet knowledge gaps persist among pediatric hematology/oncology (PHO) fellows. Objective Pediatric Opioid Analgesia Self‐Instruction System (PedOASIS) is an interactive, case‐based education tool designed for independent learning. The goal of this study was to evaluate its efficacy in increasing PHO fellows’ knowledge and comfort with using opioids to manage pain. Design/method PHO fellows were recruited from 74 American College of Graduate Medical Education‐accredited US programs during the 2019–2020 academic year and randomized to receive access to PedOASIS (intervention) or usual PHO training (control). Surveys at baseline, immediately after accessing the tool, and 6 months later assessed knowledge and comfort related to prescribing opioids. Results A total of 64 PHO fellows completed the study, with 32 in the intervention group and 32 controls. At baseline, mean scores on the 10‐question knowledge assessment were similar between groups (intervention: 5, control: 6; p = .8). Following intervention, mean score was significantly higher in the intervention group (9) versus controls (5; p 
ISSN:1545-5009
1545-5017
DOI:10.1002/pbc.30305