Diagnostic Performance of Total Platelet Count, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio for Overall and Complicated Pediatric Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic performance of total platelet count (PC), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA). We conducted a systematic review of the literature in the main databases of medical bibliogr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical infections 2023-05, Vol.24 (4), p.311-321
Hauptverfasser: Arredondo Montero, Javier, Pérez Riveros, Blanca Paola, Martín-Calvo, Nerea
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this study was to analyze the diagnostic performance of total platelet count (PC), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA). We conducted a systematic review of the literature in the main databases of medical bibliography. Two independent reviewers selected the articles and extracted relevant data. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS2 index. A synthesis of the results, a standardization of the metrics, and four random effect meta-analyses were performed. Thirteen studies including data from 4,373 participants (2,767 patients with confirmed diagnosis of PAA and 1,606 controls) were included. Five studies compared PC, and the meta-analysis including three of them showed a non-significant mean difference of -34.47 platelets/1 × 10 /L (95% confidence interval [CI], -88.10 to 19.16). Seven publications compared PLR and the meta-analysis of those studies showed significant mean differences between patients with PAA and controls (dif: 49.84; 95% CI, 25.82-73.85) as well as between patients with complicated and uncomplicated PAA (dif: 49.42; 95% CI, 25.47-73.37). Four studies compared LMR and the meta-analysis including 3 of them showed a non-significant mean difference of -1.88 (95% CI, -3.86 to 0.10). Although existing evidence is heterogeneous and limited, PLR appears to be a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of PAA and for the discrimination between complicated and uncomplicated PAA. Our results do not support the use of PC or LMR as biomarkers in PAA.
ISSN:1096-2964
1557-8674
DOI:10.1089/sur.2023.013