Real‐world use of Control‐IQ™ technology automated insulin delivery in pregnancy: A case series with qualitative interviews

Background Most commercially available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems are not approved for pregnancy use. Information regarding use of the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control‐IQ™ technology in pregnancy is lacking. Aims This case series aimed to explore glycaemic and qualitative exp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetic medicine 2023-06, Vol.40 (6), p.e15086-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Xinye Serena, Dunlop, Amy D., McKeen, Julie A., Feig, Denice S., Donovan, Lois E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Most commercially available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems are not approved for pregnancy use. Information regarding use of the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control‐IQ™ technology in pregnancy is lacking. Aims This case series aimed to explore glycaemic and qualitative experiences of four early adopters of Control‐IQ technology in pregnancy. Methods Participants used Control‐IQ technology in pregnancy and postpartum and consented to analysis of glycaemic data and semi‐structured interviews. Results Case 1 began Control‐IQ technology at 10 weeks gestation. Her pregnancy glucose time‐in‐range (3.5–7.8 mmol/L [63–140 mg/dL]) increased from 58.7% to 73.3% by third trimester. Cases 2–4 began using Control‐IQ technology 0–2 months preconception. Pregnancy time‐in‐range glucose increased from 73.4% to 78.7%, 78% to 83.6%, and 46.5% to 71.9% between first and third trimesters, respectively. A mid‐pregnancy decline in time‐in‐range glucose was observed in two of the four participants related to suboptimal pump setting adjustments and delays in sensor and infusion set replacement. No diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycaemia occurred. All participants reported reduced diabetes management burden and improved sleep with Control‐IQ technology use. Conclusions Early adopters of Control‐IQ technology safely used this system off‐label in pregnancy and reported reduced diabetes management burden and improved sleep. The largest glycaemic improvements were observed among those with the lowest pregnancy time‐in‐range glucose at the beginning of pregnancy. Participants with low pregnancy glucose time‐in‐range increased their time‐in‐range with Control‐IQ technology use and participants with high pregnancy glucose time‐in‐range maintained and increased their time‐in‐range with less diabetes management burden.
ISSN:0742-3071
1464-5491
DOI:10.1111/dme.15086