Modeling and optimization of the coagulation/flocculation process in turbidity removal from water using poly aluminum chloride and rice starch as a natural coagulant aid

The application of the coagulation/flocculation process is very important due to its simplicity in removing turbidity. Due to the disadvantages of using chemical coagulants in water and the lack of sufficient effect of natural materials alone in removing turbidity for proper performance, the simulta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental monitoring and assessment 2023-04, Vol.195 (4), p.527-527, Article 527
Hauptverfasser: Asadi-Ghalhari, Mahdi, Usefi, Saideh, Ghafouri, Nassim, Kishipour, Amin, Mostafaloo, Roqiyeh, Tabatabaei, Fatemeh sadat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The application of the coagulation/flocculation process is very important due to its simplicity in removing turbidity. Due to the disadvantages of using chemical coagulants in water and the lack of sufficient effect of natural materials alone in removing turbidity for proper performance, the simultaneous use of chemical and natural coagulants is the best way to reduce the harmful effects of chemical coagulants in water. In this study, the application of poly aluminum chloride (PAC) as a chemical coagulant and rice starch as a natural coagulant aid to remove turbidity from aqueous solutions was investigated. Effects of the above coagulants on the four main factors, coagulant dose (0–10 mg/L), coagulant adjuvant dose (0–0.1 mg/L), pH (5–9), turbidity (NTU 0–50), and each five levels were assessed using a central composite design (CCD). Under the optimized conditions, the maximum turbidity elimination efficiency was found to be 96.6%. The validity and adequacy of the proposed model (quadratic model) were confirmed by the corresponding statistics (i.e., F -value of 23.3, p -values of 0.0001, and lack of fit of 0.877 for the model, respectively, R 2  = 0.88, R 2 adj . = 0.84, R 2 pred  = 0.79, AP = 22.04). Graphical Abstract
ISSN:0167-6369
1573-2959
DOI:10.1007/s10661-023-11150-8