QuikSCAT Satellite Comparisons with Nearshore Buoy Wind Data off the U.S. West Coast

To determine the accuracy of nearshore winds from the QuikSCAT satellite, winds from three satellite datasets (scientifically processed swath, gridded near-real-time, and gridded science datasets) were compared to those from 12 nearshore and 3 offshore U.S. West Coast buoys. Satellite observations f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of atmospheric and oceanic technology 2003-12, Vol.20 (12), p.1869-1879
Hauptverfasser: Pickett, M H, Tang, W, Rosenfeld, L K, Wash, CH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine the accuracy of nearshore winds from the QuikSCAT satellite, winds from three satellite datasets (scientifically processed swath, gridded near-real-time, and gridded science datasets) were compared to those from 12 nearshore and 3 offshore U.S. West Coast buoys. Satellite observations from August 1999 to December 2000 that were within 25 km and 30 min of each buoy were used. Comparisons showed that satellite-buoy wind differences near shore were larger than those offshore. Editing the satellite data by discarding observations recorded in rain and those recorded in light winds improved the accuracy of all three datasets. After removing rain-flagged data and wind speeds less than 3 m s-1, root-mean-squared differences (satellite minus buoy) for swath data, the best of the three datasets, were 1.4 m s-1 and 37 degree based on 5741 nearshore comparisons. By removing winds less than 6 m s-1, these differences were reduced to 1.3 m s-1 and 26 degree . At the three offshore buoys, the root-mean-squared differences for the swath data, with both rain and winds less than 6 m s-1 removed, were 1.0 m s-1 and 15 degree based on 1920 comparisons. Although the satellite's scientifically processed swath data near shore do not match buoy observations as closely as those offshore, they are sufficiently accurate for many coastal studies.
ISSN:0739-0572
1520-0426
DOI:10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020(1869:QSCWNB)2.0.CO;2