Airo® navigation versus freehand fluoroscopy technique: A comparative study of accuracy and radiological exposure for thoracolumbar screws placement
•We compared freehand fluoroscopy versus CT navigation for thoracolumbar screws.•Accuracy and radiological exposure were studied.•A total of 918 screws were analyzed.•The use of Airo® navigation yielded good accuracy.•It however exposed the patient to higher radiological exposure. The aim was to com...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuro-chirurgie 2023-05, Vol.69 (3), p.101437-101437, Article 101437 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •We compared freehand fluoroscopy versus CT navigation for thoracolumbar screws.•Accuracy and radiological exposure were studied.•A total of 918 screws were analyzed.•The use of Airo® navigation yielded good accuracy.•It however exposed the patient to higher radiological exposure.
The aim was to compare the accuracy of freehand fluoroscopy and CT based navigation on thoracolumbar screws placement and their respective effects on radiological exposure to the patient. No previous study directly compared the Airo® navigation system to freehand technique.
In this monocentric retrospective study, 156 consecutive patients who underwent thoracolumbar spine surgery were included. Epidemiological data and surgical indications were noted. Heary classification was used for thoracic screws and Gertzbein-Robbins classification for lumbar screws. Radiological exposure was collected for each surgery.
A total of 918 screws were implanted. We analyzed 725 lumbar screws (Airo® 287; freehand fluoroscopy 438) and 193 thoracic screws (Airo® 49; freehand fluoroscopy 144). Overall, lumbar screws accuracy (Gertzbein-Robbins grade A and B) was good in both groups (freehand fluoroscopy 91.3%; Airo® 97.6%; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-3770 1773-0619 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.neuchi.2023.101437 |