The definition of long COVID used in interventional studies

Introduction There has been little consensus for a specific definition of long COVID, though several organizations have created varying ones. We sought to examine the definition of long COVID used in ongoing clinical trials. Methods We searched ‘long COVID’ and related terms on both PubMed and clini...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of clinical investigation 2023-08, Vol.53 (8), p.e13989-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Haslam, Alyson, Olivier, Timothée, Prasad, Vinay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction There has been little consensus for a specific definition of long COVID, though several organizations have created varying ones. We sought to examine the definition of long COVID used in ongoing clinical trials. Methods We searched ‘long COVID’ and related terms on both PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov for randomized studies that either included patients with long COVID or had a persistent or long‐term COVID‐related outcome and ed long COVID definition components. Results Of the 92 studies, a laboratory‐only confirmed diagnosis of COVID‐19 was stipulated in 54.3% (n = 50) studies. We found eight different time durations specified for how long symptoms needed to have occurred, ranging from 4 to 52 weeks, with 12 weeks being the most common (34.8%; n = 32). 35.9% (n = 33) did not specify a time duration. There were 57 different symptoms specified in total, with a median of one symptom identified per study (range 0–32). 8.7% of trials adhered to NICE or WHO definitions. Conclusion Standardized definitions of long COVID should be applied in studies assessing this condition to unify and harmonize research on this topic.
ISSN:0014-2972
1365-2362
DOI:10.1111/eci.13989