Decision-making and frontoparietal resting-state functional connectivity among impulsive-compulsive diagnoses. Insights from a Bayesian approach

•Hybrid cluster analyses revealed three decision-making profiles during the IGT.•Profiles contained the same proportion of participants of each diagnostic category.•Bayesian GLM showed no relationship between FPN and behavior during the IGT. The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is one of the most widely use...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Addictive behaviors 2023-08, Vol.143, p.107683-107683, Article 107683
Hauptverfasser: León, J.J., Fernández-Martin, P., González-Rodríguez, A., Rodríguez-Herrera, R., García-Pinteño, J., Pérez-Fernández, C., Sánchez-Kuhn, A., Amaya-Pascasio, L., Soto-Ontoso, M., Martínez-Sánchez, P., Sánchez-Santed, F., Flores, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Hybrid cluster analyses revealed three decision-making profiles during the IGT.•Profiles contained the same proportion of participants of each diagnostic category.•Bayesian GLM showed no relationship between FPN and behavior during the IGT. The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is one of the most widely used paradigms for assessing decision-making. An impairment in this process may be linked to several psychopathological disorders, such as obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), substance abuse disorder (SUD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which could make it a good candidate for being consider a transdiagnostic domain. Resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) has been proposed as a promising biomarker of decision-making. In this study, we aimed to identify idiosyncratic decision-making profiles among healthy people and impulsive-compulsive spectrum patients during the IGT, and to investigate the role of frontoparietal network (FPN) rsFC as a possible biomarker of different decision-making patterns. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), rsFC of 114 adults (34 controls; 25 OCD; 41 SUD; 14 ADHD) was obtained. Then, they completed the IGT. Hybrid clustering methods based on individual deck choices yielded three decision-makers subgroups. Cluster 1 (n = 27) showed a long-term advantageous strategy. Cluster 2 (n = 25) presented a maladaptive decision-making strategy. Cluster 3 (n = 62) did not develop a preference for any deck during the task. Interestingly, the proportion of participants in each cluster was not different between diagnostic groups. A Bayesian general linear model showed no credible differences in the IGT performance between diagnostic groups nor credible evidence to support the role of FPN rsFC as a biomarker of decision-making under the IGT context. This study highlights the importance of exploring in depth the behavioral and neurophysiological variables that may drive decision-making in clinical and healthy populations.
ISSN:0306-4603
1873-6327
DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107683