Three double-dose reinforced hepatitis B revaccination scheme for patients with cirrhosis unresponsive to the standard regimen: an open-label randomised clinical trial

ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the response rates between two different hepatitis B virus vaccination schedules for cirrhotic subjects who were non-responders to the first three 40 µg doses (month 0-1-2), and identify factors associated with the final response.DesignA total of 120 cirrhotic patients (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2024-01, Vol.73 (1), p.166-174
Hauptverfasser: Giráldez-Gallego, Álvaro, Rodríguez-Seguel, Elisa del Pilar, Valencia-Martín, Raquel, Morillo-García, Áurea, Salamanca-Rivera, Celia, Ruiz-Pérez, Ricardo, Cuaresma-Duque, María, Rosso-Fernández, Clara, Ferrer-Ríos, María Teresa, Sousa-Martín, José Manuel, Praena-Fernández, Juan Manuel, Desongles-Corrales, Trinidad, Rodríguez-Pérez, Aitana, Camino-Durán, Francisco, Gasch-Illescas, Antonia, Ampuero-Herrojo, Javier, Pascasio-Acevedo, Juan Manuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the response rates between two different hepatitis B virus vaccination schedules for cirrhotic subjects who were non-responders to the first three 40 µg doses (month 0-1-2), and identify factors associated with the final response.DesignA total of 120 cirrhotic patients (72.5% decompensated) were randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive a single 40 µg booster vaccination at month 6 (classical arm) versus an additional round of three new 40 µg doses administered at monthly intervals (experimental arm). The main outcome was the rate of postvaccinal anti-hepatitis B surface antibodies levels ≥10 mIU/mL.ResultsEfficacy by ITT analysis was higher in the experimental arm (46.7%) than in the classical one (25%); OR 2.63, p=0.013. The experimental arm increased response rates compared with the classical one from 31% to 68% (OR 4.72; p=0.007), from 24.4% to 50% (OR 3.09; p=0.012) and from 24.4% to 53.8% (OR 3.62; p=0.007), in Child A, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
1468-3288
DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328222