Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: Quality over quantity

Background and Objectives The ideal duration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with curative intent is unclear. We sought to determine the prognostic significance of both duration of NACT and Carbohydrate Antigen 19‐9 (CA19‐9) norm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical oncology 2023-07, Vol.128 (1), p.41-50
Hauptverfasser: Thalji, Sam Z., Aldakkak, Mohammed, Christians, Kathleen K., Clarke, Callisia N., George, Ben, Kamgar, Mandana, Erickson, Beth A., Hall, William A., Chisholm, Phillip, Kulkarni, Naveen, Doucette, Saryn, Evans, Douglas B., Tsai, Susan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Objectives The ideal duration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with curative intent is unclear. We sought to determine the prognostic significance of both duration of NACT and Carbohydrate Antigen 19‐9 (CA19‐9) normalization to NACT. Methods We examined patients with resectable and borderline resectable PDAC treated with NACT and chemoradiation. Patients were compared by NACT duration (2 vs. 4 months) and by CA19‐9 normalization after NACT. Results Among 171 patients, 83 (49%) received 2 months of NACT, and 88 (51%) received 4 months. After NACT completion, 115 (67%) patients had persistently elevated CA19‐9, and 56 (33%) had normalized. Of the 125 patients who had successful surgery, 73 (58%) had normalized CA19‐9 postoperatively. Duration of NACT was not associated with overall survival (OS) while CA19‐9 normalization after NACT (regardless of duration) was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35–0.89, p = 0.02). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS among patients without CA19‐9 normalization after NACT (HR 0.42, CI 0.20–0.86, p = 0.02) but not among those that normalized, independent of duration. Conclusions CA19‐9 normalization after NACT is a clinically significant endpoint of treatment; patients without CA19‐9 normalization may benefit from additional therapy.
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.27265