Biosynthetic meshes in contaminated fields: where are we now? A systematic review and meta-analysis in humans

Purpose Selection of an appropriate mesh reinforcement for hernia repair in contaminated fields is a significant problem for surgeons. To date the proper mesh for contaminated fields has not been found. Biosynthetic meshes have emerged as new treatment option in contaminated fields. This study aims...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery 2023-08, Vol.27 (4), p.765-780
Hauptverfasser: Perrone, G., Giuffrida, M., Bonati, E., Petracca, G. L., Catena, F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Selection of an appropriate mesh reinforcement for hernia repair in contaminated fields is a significant problem for surgeons. To date the proper mesh for contaminated fields has not been found. Biosynthetic meshes have emerged as new treatment option in contaminated fields. This study aims to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of biosynthetic meshes in contaminated fields. Methods Systematic electronic search (PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus), according to PRISMA criteria, was performed. A literature search of scientific papers was performed by two reviewers until April 2021. Articles were chosen based on reference to biosynthetic meshes, their use in infected fields, and in human subjects. GRADE methodology and the modified Newcastle–Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of studies. According to CDC-Centers for Disease Control classes patients were divided into two subgroups, group 1 (CDC class 2) and group 2 (CDC classes 3–4). Results The research included 21 articles and 1619 patients were analyzed. Long-term follow-up showed a significant higher recurrence rate than short-term follow-up. P  
ISSN:1248-9204
1265-4906
1248-9204
DOI:10.1007/s10029-023-02763-6