Simultaneous assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony using integrated 13N-ammonia PETMR system: direct comparison of PET phase analysis and MR feature tracking

To compare phase analysis with positron emission tomography (PA) and magnetic resonance feature tracking derived myocardial strain (FT) for left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony using PETMR system in patients with ischemic heart disease. Patients who underwent rest-pharmacological stress 13N...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nuclear cardiology 2023-10, Vol.30 (5), p.1947-1958
Hauptverfasser: Fukushima, Kenji, Endo, Keiichiro, Yamakuni, Ryo, Kiko, Takatoyo, Sekino, Hirofumi, Kikori, Katsuyuki, Ukon, Naoyuki, Ishii, Shiro, Yamaki, Takayoshi, Ito, Hiroshi, Takeishi, Yasuchika
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare phase analysis with positron emission tomography (PA) and magnetic resonance feature tracking derived myocardial strain (FT) for left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony using PETMR system in patients with ischemic heart disease. Patients who underwent rest-pharmacological stress 13N ammonia PETMR were enrolled. Histogram bandwidth (BW) and phase standard deviation (PSD) were compared to global longitudinal, long axis radial, short axis circumferential, and radial strain (GLS, GRS, SA Circ, and SA Rad) obtained from FT. LV dyssynchrony index (SDI) derived from PA and FT were compared. BW and PSD showed significant correlations with FT (a Pearson’s coefficient r = 0.64, P < .0001, and r = 0.51, P < .0001 for SA Circ; r = 0.67, P < .0001, and r = 0.74, P < .0001 for GLS; r = − 0.60, P < .0001, r = − 0.61, P < .0001 for SA Rad; r = − 0.62, P < .0001, and r = − 0.68, P < .0001 for GRS, respectively). Bland-Altman plots for SDI showed a preferable agreement (95% limit of agreement − 0.12 to 0.075, − 0.20 to 0.098, − 0.38 to 0.077, and − 0.37 to 0.032; bias 0.0068 ± 0.056, 0.026 ± 0.068, 0.11 ± 0.088, and 0.13 ± 0.079 for SA Circ, SA Rad, GLS, and GRS, respectively). In simultaneous acquisition using PETMR, comparison of PET phase analysis and MR strain showed a good correlation.
ISSN:1071-3581
1532-6551
DOI:10.1007/s12350-023-03225-3