New insights into breast microcalcification for poor prognosis: NACT cohort and bone metastasis evaluation cohort

Objectives The study aimed to analyze the poor prognosis of microcalcification in breast cancer (BC), including the pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and the risk of bone metastases. Materials and methods 313 breast cancer patients received NACT to evaluate pCR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2023-08, Vol.149 (10), p.7285-7297
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Yangling, Mao, Lijuan, Wang, Mengyi, Li, Zhenqiu, Li, Meizhi, Wang, Chaoyang, Ji, Lin, Zeng, Hui, Zhang, Xiaoling
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives The study aimed to analyze the poor prognosis of microcalcification in breast cancer (BC), including the pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and the risk of bone metastases. Materials and methods 313 breast cancer patients received NACT to evaluate pCR and 1182 patients from a multicenter database to assess bone metastases were retrospectively included. Two groups were divided according to the presence or absence of mammography microcalcification. Clinical data, image characteristics, neoadjuvant treatment response, bone involvement, and follow-up information were recorded. The pCR and bone metastases were compared between subgroups using the Mann–Whitney and χ 2 tests and logistic regression, respectively. Results Mammographic microcalcification was associated with a lower pCR than uncalcified BC in the NACT cohort (20.6% vs 31.6%, P  = 0.029). Univariate and multivariate analysis suggested that calcification was a risk factor for poor NACT response [OR = 1.780, 95%CI (1.065–2.974), P  = 0.028], [OR = 2.352, 95%CI (1.186–4.667), P  = 0.014]. Microcalcification was more likely to be necrosis on MRI than those without microcalcification (53.0% vs 31.7%, P  
ISSN:0171-5216
1432-1335
DOI:10.1007/s00432-023-04668-4