Comparing the predictive ability of portoatrial and portocaval gradient after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for variceal rebleeding

Background Measuring the portal pressure gradient from the portal vein (PV) to the inferior vena cava (IVC) or to the right atrium (RA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the predictive ability of portoatrial gradient (PAG) and portocaval gradient (PCG) for variceal rebleedin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology 2023-05, Vol.58 (5), p.494-502
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Li, Liu, Yaozu, Yan, Zhiping, Zhang, Wen, Zhang, Zihan, Yang, Minjie, Yu, Jiaze, Zhou, Xin, Chen, Shiyao, Wang, Jian, Ma, Jingqin, Luo, Jianjun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Measuring the portal pressure gradient from the portal vein (PV) to the inferior vena cava (IVC) or to the right atrium (RA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the predictive ability of portoatrial gradient (PAG) and portocaval gradient (PCG) for variceal rebleeding. Methods The data of 285 cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding undergoing elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. The variceal rebleeding rates were compared between groups categorized by established or modified thresholds. The median follow-up time was 30.0 months. Results After TIPS, PAG was equal to ( n  = 115) or more than ( n  = 170) PCG. The pressure of IVC was defined as an independent predictor for a PAG-PCG difference of ≥ 2 mmHg ( p  
ISSN:0944-1174
1435-5922
DOI:10.1007/s00535-023-01977-w